Subject Code and Title Assessment 2 - Group collaboration and individual report: PMBoK versus PRINCE2 or Agile in contemporary projects Assessment Group Collaboration and Individual Report Submission Laureate International Universities
Learning Outcomes
Successful completion of this assignment will result in achievement of the following subject learning outcomes:
Context:
There are several project management methodologies that are used in contemporary project management. Each has certain specific elements that its proponents say make it easier to use, more applicable, more robust or other utilities. While these methodologies are all valid and reliable tools for a project manager to use, it is important to be able to contrast them and to form a view of how they might best be used in a project. This includes their usefulness, application in various types of projects and how they view project risk.
This assessment has two parts:
You will need to consult the literature and use at least 6 references (and not more than 12 references) from academic and industry sources. The word count does not include the reference list. Each reference must be in-text cited in your report. The word count is +/- 10%.
The assessment requires that you submit your report via the Learning Management System. You do not need to upload anything relating to your group discussions in weeks 4 and 5.
Instructions:
Write your 1,200-word report with the headings
Output and Submission:
Submit your completed assessment by the end of module 3 (Week 6) on Blackboard.
Learning Resources:
Jamali, G., & Oveisi, M. (2016). A study on project management based on PMBOK and PRINCE2. Modern Applied Science, 10(6), 142-146. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7cf6/bc6583311e0086d82fad396af945392bb67c.pdf
Matos, S., & Lopes, E. (2013). Prince2 or PMBOK–a question of choice. Procedia Technology,
9(2), 787-794. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212017313002417
Rehacek, P. (2017). Application and usage of the standards for project management and their comparison. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(4), 994-1002. http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/medwelljournals/jeasci/2017/994-1002.pdf
Assignment Service Australia | CDR Writing Help | TAFE Assignment Help | Perth Assignment Help | Melbourne Assignment Help | Darwin Assignment Help | Adelaide Assignment Help | Assignment Help Victoria | Sydney Assignment Help | Canberra Assignment Help | Brisbane Assignment Help | CDR for Australian immigration | Assignment For Australian History
Assignment Writing Help
Engineering Assignment Services
Do My Assignment Help
Write My Essay Services