MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment Help
ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF |
|
Subject Code and Title |
MGT603: Systems Thinking |
Assessment |
Part A: Proposal Individual (500 Words) Part B: Critique (500 Words) |
Individual/Group |
Individual |
Length |
Part A: One (1) Original Post (maximum 500 words) Part B: Two (2) Critiques, Each critique max. 250 words |
Learning Outcomes |
a) Critically evaluate the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualization and its application to contemporary business issues |
Weighting |
Part A: 20% Part B: 20% |
Total Marks |
Part A: 20 marks Part B: 20 marks |
Context:
Systems thinking requires us to take a holistic view of the world we live in and the organisations we work with. This assessment has been prescribed to appraise students’ ability to think holistically and generate discussion around recognising and understanding organisational operations using a Systems Thinking lens. The assessment will broaden students’ knowledge of and appreciation for using a different approach to look for and solve problems faced by managers in contemporary organisations.
This assessment has been designed to:
- Appraise your ability to academically research and evaluate paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and apply to contemporary business issues.
- You are expected to utilise the literature provided in Modules 1 to 3.1 in your analysis and discussion, and are required to apply critical thinking, presenting multi-sided findings.
- Successful completion of this assessment will help you to further understand Systems Thinking in a practical context. It will also help you to maintain currency in the increasingly changing industry.
Guidelines: There are two (2) parts to MGT603 Assessment 1. For an acceptable result, you will need to complete both Part A and Part B of MGT603 Assessment 1.
MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A):
Task Instructions:
List of Case Organisations
From the below list, please select only ONE case organisation for your Assessment 1 (Part A) and follow the provided instructions within theMGT603 Assessment Brief 1.
- Atlassian
- Grill’d3.
- Event Cinemas
- T2 tea
- Strandbags
- Please review the MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) list of case organisations (found in the Assessment 1 – Part A Proposal Individual & Part B Critique Individual page on MGT603 Blackboard).
- From the MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) list of case organisations, only choose ONE
(1) case organisation for MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A).
- Read and research widely on the selected case organisation and find out how “COVID19 Pandemic” has created a significant issue/challenge/problem for your selected case organisation in 2021 and how “Systems Thinking Approach” can assist in making optimal decisions.
- You are then required to prepare and post in the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum at least ONE (1) original post identifying intended or unintended consequences on various stakeholders of your chosen organisation and then recommend/propose alternative policies/procedures using Systems Thinking approach to help overcome the problem.
Key points to consider in your MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A):
- Your proposal should be “holistic”.
- You must include references to “Systems Thinking Literature”. Please make sure to use at least 3 academic-related references (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and conference papers) and at least 2 other references (e.g. newspaper, magazines, websites, etc.). It is essential to use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. For more information, please check http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
- Make sure to consider using Systems Thinking tools such as Rich Picture and CATWOE in your MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A).
- Make sure to number all sections and sub-sections within your assessment (e.g.
1, 1.1, etc.).
- All inserted Figures and Tables within the assessment require being labelled and numbered appropriately (e.g. Figure 1: Rich Picture …., Table 1: CATWOE Analysis ….). They all require being initially stated/introduced and then discussed in-detail and in-depth. Please make sure to provide the source/reference for the information expressed via the Figures and Tables.
- Make sure to provide a brief rational of why it is important to use Systems Thinking and relevant tools and techniques to solve the identified organisational problem to minimize adverse consequences.
- Please make sure to write in the “third person” (e.g. The author, The writer, etc.).
- Please ensure your original posts are submitted in the MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) Discussion Forum by the end of Module 2.2 (Friday of Week 4).
MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment Answers by assignmenthelp.net plagiarism-free at affordable prices
MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B):
Task Instructions:
- Each student is required to critique an original post (Part A) of two (2) peers.
- Each Critique should be maximum of 250 words. Overall your Assessment 1 (Part B) should be maximum of 500 words.
- Your Critique should include commentary on:
- Whether the original post is holistic. Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback.
- Have all plausible consequences been identified?
- Have Systems Thinking tools been used and used properly? Please provide a critique of these tools and their use in solving the identified problem.
- Please make sure to highlight the authors of the chosen posts.
- Please ensure to submit Assessment 1 (Part B) in the related Discussion Forum Thread, by the end ofModule 3.1 (Friday of Week 5)
- It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research where necessary and required. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Key points to consider in your MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B):
- This assessment is designed to create robust discussion around Systems Thinking with your peers. Please feel free to post more than what is specified to broaden your understanding and appreciation of the topic.
- While presenting your views, you are required to support claims either with the relevant experience or with the published literature (e.g. Journal articles, book chapters, relevant website links, news article, magazines).
- The views could be supporting comments and feedback, or they may be a contradiction, but you need to provide appropriate justification as specified above.
- If referring to published literature to support stated views, you are required to cite the reference(s) and list the reference(s) at the end of your response in the “References” section. If you can provide appropriate articles to support an opinion, it will be valued considerably.
- Along with actively participating in the discussions, it is equally important to provide responses, which are relevant and add value to the discussion. The quality of response will be considered as one of the most important criteria for evaluating students in MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B).
MGT03 Assessment 1 (Part A) and (Part B) Submission Instructions:
- Submit MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) via the MGT603 Assessment 1 Part A - Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site.
- Submit MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B) via the MGT603 Assessment 1 Part B Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site.
The Learning Facilitator will provide constructive feedback via the Grade Centre in the Student portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Learning Rubric: MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 1 Part A and Part B
Assessment Attributes |
Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% |
Pass (Functional) 50-64% |
Credit (Proficient) 65-74% |
Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% |
High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Knowledge and understanding (technical and theoretical knowledge) Understands theoretical models and concepts Percentage for this criterion 25% |
Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are not addressed. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are not identified. |
Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed at very preliminary level. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used but at very superficial level. |
Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed at appropriate level. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used with clarity. |
Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed comprehensively. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used with high level of understanding. |
A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed thoroughly. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used demonstrating mastery in the use of these tools. |
Context, Audience and Purpose Percentage for this criterion 25% |
Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. |
Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. |
Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. |
Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment. |
Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment. |
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Percentage for this criterion 25% |
Limited synthesis and analysis. Limited application/ Recommendations based upon analysis. No critique on the peers’ posts. Just summarized the peers’ posts. |
Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. Critiqued on the peers’ post however, there is lack of depth and insight. |
Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. Critiqued on the peers’ post with appropriate depth and insight. |
Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. Critiqued on the peers’ post comprehensively covering most of the missing aspect. |
Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. Critiqued on the peers’ post comprehensively covering most of the missing aspects with creative insights. |
Effective Communication Percentage for this criterion 15% |
Difficult to understand, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. |
Information, arguments, and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. |
Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. |
Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the proposal and critique is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. |
Expertly presented; the proposal and critique is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. |
Assessment Attributes |
Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% |
Pass (Functional) 50-64% |
Credit (Proficient) 65-74% |
Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% |
High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion 10% |
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. |
Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. |
Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. |
Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. |
Demonstrates use of highquality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. |
Diploma Universities Assignments
- Laureate International Universities Assignment
- Holmes Institute Assignment
- Tafe NSW
- Yes College Australia
- ACC508 Informatics and Financial Applications Task 2 T2, 2019
- ACC512 Accounting
- ACC520 Legal Regulation of Business Structures Semester 2, 2019
- ACCT20074 Contemporary Accounting Theory Term 2 Assessment 3
- AERO2463 Computational Engineering Analysis : Assignment 4
- B01DBFN212 Database Fundamentals Assessment 1
- BE01106 - Business Statistics Assignment
- BFA301 Advanced Financial Accounting
- BFA504 Accounting Systems Assessment 3
- BSB61015 Advanced Diploma of Leadership and Management
- BSBADV602 Develop an Advertising Campaign
- BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems case study
- BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems Assessment Task 1
- BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems Assessment Task 2
- BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems Assessment Task 3
- BSBFIM501 Manage Budgets And Financial Plans Assessment Task 1
- BSBHRM602 Manage Human Resources Strategic Planning
- BSBINM601 Manage Knowledge and Information
- BSBWOR501 Assessment Task 3 Plan Personal Development Plan Project
- BSBMGT517 Manage Operational Plan
- BSBWHS521 Ensure a Safe Workplace For a Work Area
- BSBWRK510 Manage employee relations
- BUSS1030 Accounting, Business and Society
- CAB202 Microprocessors and Digital Systems Assignment Help
- CHC40213 Certificate IV in Education Support
- CHCAGE001 Facilitate the empowerment of older people
- CHCAGE005 Provide support to people living with dementia
- CHCCCS023 Support independence and wellbeing
- CHCCCS025 Support relationships with carers and families
- CHCCOM005 Communicate and CHCLEG001 Work Legally Ethically
- CHCDIS002 Follow established person-centred behaviour supports
- CHCECE019 Early Childhood Education and Care
- CHCHCS001 Provide home and community support services
- COMP10002 Foundations of Algorithms
- COMP90038 Algorithms and Complexity
- COSC2633/2637 Big Data Processing
- COSC473 Introduction to Computer Systems
- CPCCBC5011A Manage Environmental Management Practices And Processes In Building And Construction
- CPCCBC5018A Apply structural Principles Medium rise Construction
- CSE3OSA Assignment 2019
- ELEC242 2019 Session 2
- ENN543 Data Analytics and Optimisation
- ENN543 Data Analytics and Optimisation Semester 2, 2019
- FINM202 Financial Management Assessment 3 Group Report
- Forensic Investigation Case Assignment ECU University
- HA2042 Accounting Information Systems T2 2019
- HC1010 Holmes Institute Accounting For Business
- HC2112 Service Marketing and Relationship Marketing Individual Assignment T2 2019
- HC2121 Comparative Business Ethics & Social Responsibility T2 2019
- HI5002 Holmes Institute Finance for Business
- HI5003 Economics for Business Trimester 2 2019
- HI5004 Marketing Management T1 2020 Individual Report
- HI5004 Marketing Management T1 2020 Group Report
- HI5004 Holmes Institute Marketing Management
- HI5014 International Business across Borders Assignment 1
- HI5014 International Business across Borders
- HI5017 Managerial Accounting T2 2019
- HI5017 Managerial Accounting T1 2019
- HI5019 Tutorial Questions 1
- HI5019 Strategic Information Systems for Business and Enterprise T1 2020
- HI5019 Holmes Institute Strategic Information Systems T2
- HI5019 T2 2019
- HI5019 T1 2019
- HI5020 Corporate Accounting T3 2019
- HI5020 Corporate Accounting T2 2019
- HI6005: Management and Organisations in a Global Environment
- HI6006 Tutorial questions
- HI6006 Competitive Strategy Individual T1 2020
- HI6006 Holmes Institute Competitive Strategy
- HI6006 Competitive Strategy T3 2019
- HI6007 Statistics for business decisions
- HI6007 Assessment 2 T1 2020
- HI6007 T1 2019
- HI6008 T2 2019
- HI6008 Holmes Institute Research Project
- HI6025 Accounting Theory and Current Issues
- HI6026 Audit, Assurance and Compliance Assignment Help
- HI6026 Audit, Assurance and Compliance
- HI6027 business and corporate law tutorial Assignment T1 2021
- HI6027 Business and Corporate Law T3 2019
- HI6027 Business and Corporate Law T2 2019
- HI6028 Taxation Theory, Practice and Law T2 2021
- Hi6028 taxation theory, practice and law Final Assessment t1 2021
- HI6028 Taxation Theory, Practice and Law T2 2019
- HI6028 Taxation Theory T1 2019
- HI6028 Taxation Law Holmes
- HLTAAP001 Recognise healthy body systems
- HLTWHS002 Follow safe practices for direct client care
- HOTL5003 Hotel Property and Operations
- HPS771 - Research Methods in Psychology A
- HS2021 Database Design
- ICTICT307 Customise packaged software applications for clients
- IFN619 Data Analytics for Strategic Decision Makers
- INF80028 Business Process Management Swinburne University
- ISY2005 Case Assignment Assessment 2
- ISYS326: Information Systems Security Assignment 2, Semester 2, 2019
- ITAP3010 Developing Data Access Solutions Project
- ITECH1103- Big Data and Analytics – Lab 3 – Working with Data Items
- ITECH1103- Big Data and Analytics Assignment Semester 1, 2020
- ITECH 5500 Professional Research and Communication
- Kent Institute Australia Assignment
- MA5830 Data Visualisation Assignment 2
- MGMT7020 Project Management Plan
- Mgt 301 Assessment 3
- MGT215 Project Management Individual Assignment
- MIS102 Data and Networking Assignment Help
- MITS4002 Object Oriented Software Development
- MITS5002 Software Engineering Methodology
- MKT01760 Tourism Planning Environments Assessment 4
- MKT01760 Tourism Planning Environments
- MKT01906 International Tourism Systems
- MKT5000 Marketing Management S2 2019
- MNG03236 Report Writing SCU
- MRE5003 Industrial Techniques In Maintenance Management Assignment 4
- MRE5003 Industrial Techniques In Maintenance Management Assignment 3
- MRE5003 Industrial Techniques In Maintenance Management
- Network Security and Mitigation Strategies Answers
- NIT2213 Software Engineering Assignment
- NSB231 Integrated Nursing Practice Assessment Task 1
- Science Literacy Assessment 4
- SIT323 Practical Software Development T 2, 2019
- SIT718 Using aggregation functions for data analysis
- SITXCOM002 Show Social and Cultural Sensitivity
- TLIL5055 Manage a supply chain
- TLIR5014 Manage Suppliers
- USQ ACC5502 Accounting and Financial Management
- UTS: 48370 Road and Transport Engineering Assessment 2
- CHCAGE001 Facilitate the empowerment of older people
- CHCAGE005 Provide support to people living with dementia
- CHCCCS011 Meet personal support needs
- CHCCCS015 Provide Individualised Support
- CHCCCS023 Support independence and wellbeing
- CHCCCS025 Support relationships with carers and families
- CHCCOM005 Communicate and work in health or community services
- CHCDIS001 Contribute to ongoing skills development
- CHCDIS002 Follow established person-centred behaviour supports
- CHCDIS003 Support community participation and social inclusion
- CHCDIS005 Develop and provide person-centred service responses
- CHCDIS007 Facilitate the empowerment of people with disability
- CHCDIS008 Facilitate community participation and social inclusion
- CHCDIS009 Facilitate ongoing skills development
- CHCDIS010 Provide person-centred services
- CHCDIV001 Work with diverse people
- CHCHCS001 Provide home and community support services
- CHCLEG001 Work legally and ethically
- CHCLEG003 Manage legal and ethical compliance
- HLTAAP001 Recognise healthy body systems
- HLTAID003 Provide First Aid
- HLTHPS007 Administer and monitor medications
- HLTWHS002 Follow safe work practices for direct client care
- CORPFIN 7101 managerial finance assignment answers
- Assignment 2 Introduction to Digital Forensics
- MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 1
- MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 2
- Hi5017 Managerial Accounting T1 2021
- HI6028 Taxation Theory, Practice and Law T1 2021
- OODP101 Assessment Task 3 T1 2021
- ITNE2003R Network Configuration and Management Project
Australia Universities
Year 11 - 12 Certification Assignment
- 24 x 7 Availability
- Plagiarism Free
- Trained and Certified Experts.
- Deadline Guaranteed
- Privacy Guaranteed
- Assignment Help Reward
- Online help for all project.
- Service for everyone
- Online Tutoring
- Free download.
- Free study help whitepapers
- Assignment Help
- Homework Help
- Writing Help
- Academic Writing Assistance
- Editing Services
- Plagiarism Checker Online
- Proofreading
- Research Writing Help
- Services