MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment Help

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF

Subject Code and Title

MGT603: Systems Thinking

Assessment

Part A: Proposal Individual (500 Words) Part B: Critique (500 Words)

Individual/Group

Individual

Length

Part A: One (1) Original Post (maximum 500 words)

Part B: Two (2) Critiques, Each critique max. 250 words

Learning Outcomes

a) Critically evaluate the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualization and its application to contemporary business issues

Weighting

Part A: 20% Part B: 20%

Total Marks

Part A: 20 marks Part B: 20 marks

Context:

Systems thinking requires us to take a holistic view of the world we live in and the organisations we work with. This assessment has been prescribed to appraise students’ ability to think holistically and generate discussion around recognising and understanding organisational operations using a Systems Thinking lens. The assessment will broaden students’ knowledge of and appreciation for using a different approach to look for and solve problems faced by managers in contemporary organisations.

This assessment has been designed to:

  • Appraise your ability to academically research and evaluate paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and apply to contemporary business issues.
  • You are expected to utilise the literature provided in Modules 1 to 3.1 in your analysis and discussion, and are required to apply critical thinking, presenting multi-sided findings.
  • Successful completion of this assessment will help you to further understand Systems Thinking in a practical context. It will also help you to maintain currency in the increasingly changing industry.

Guidelines: There are two (2) parts to MGT603 Assessment 1. For an acceptable result, you will need to complete both Part A and Part B of MGT603 Assessment 1.

MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A):

Task Instructions:

List of Case Organisations

From the below list, please select only ONE case organisation for your Assessment 1 (Part A) and follow the provided instructions within theMGT603 Assessment Brief 1.

  1. Atlassian
  2. Grill’d3.
  3. Event Cinemas
  4. T2 tea
  5. Strandbags
  1. Please review the MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) list of case organisations (found in the Assessment 1 – Part A Proposal Individual & Part B Critique Individual page on MGT603 Blackboard).
  2. From the MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) list of case organisations, only choose ONE

(1) case organisation for MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A).

  1. Read and research widely on the selected case organisation and find out how “COVID19 Pandemic” has created a significant issue/challenge/problem for your selected case organisation in 2021 and how “Systems Thinking Approach” can assist in making optimal decisions.
  2. You are then required to prepare and post in the Assessment 1 Discussion Forum at least ONE (1) original post identifying intended or unintended consequences on various stakeholders of your chosen organisation and then recommend/propose alternative policies/procedures using Systems Thinking approach to help overcome the problem.

Key points to consider in your MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A):

  • Your proposal should be “holistic”.
  • You must include references to “Systems Thinking Literature”. Please make sure to use at least 3 academic-related references (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and conference papers) and at least 2 other references (e.g. newspaper, magazines, websites, etc.). It is essential to use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. For more information, please check http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
  • Make sure to consider using Systems Thinking tools such as Rich Picture and CATWOE in your MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A).
  • Make sure to number all sections and sub-sections within your assessment (e.g.

1, 1.1, etc.).

  • All inserted Figures and Tables within the assessment require being labelled and numbered appropriately (e.g. Figure 1: Rich Picture …., Table 1: CATWOE Analysis ….). They all require being initially stated/introduced and then discussed in-detail and in-depth. Please make sure to provide the source/reference for the information expressed via the Figures and Tables.
  • Make sure to provide a brief rational of why it is important to use Systems Thinking and relevant tools and techniques to solve the identified organisational problem to minimize adverse consequences.
  • Please make sure to write in the “third person” (e.g. The author, The writer, etc.).
  • Please ensure your original posts are submitted in the MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) Discussion Forum by the end of Module 2.2 (Friday of Week 4).

MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment Answers by assignmenthelp.net plagiarism-free at affordable prices


MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B):

Task Instructions:

  1. Each student is required to critique an original post (Part A) of two (2) peers.
  2. Each Critique should be maximum of 250 words. Overall your Assessment 1 (Part B) should be maximum of 500 words.
  3. Your Critique should include commentary on:
    • Whether the original post is holistic. Please identify missing components, if any, and provide constructive feedback.
    • Have all plausible consequences been identified?
    • Have Systems Thinking tools been used and used properly? Please provide a critique of these tools and their use in solving the identified problem.
    • Please make sure to highlight the authors of the chosen posts.
    • Please ensure to submit Assessment 1 (Part B) in the related Discussion Forum Thread, by the end ofModule 3.1 (Friday of Week 5)
    • It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research where necessary and required. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

Key points to consider in your MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B):

  • This assessment is designed to create robust discussion around Systems Thinking with your peers. Please feel free to post more than what is specified to broaden your understanding and appreciation of the topic.
  • While presenting your views, you are required to support claims either with the relevant experience or with the published literature (e.g. Journal articles, book chapters, relevant website links, news article, magazines).
  • The views could be supporting comments and feedback, or they may be a contradiction, but you need to provide appropriate justification as specified above.
  • If referring to published literature to support stated views, you are required to cite the reference(s) and list the reference(s) at the end of your response in the “References” section. If you can provide appropriate articles to support an opinion, it will be valued considerably.
  • Along with actively participating in the discussions, it is equally important to provide responses, which are relevant and add value to the discussion. The quality of response will be considered as one of the most important criteria for evaluating students in MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B).

MGT03 Assessment 1 (Part A) and (Part B) Submission Instructions:

  • Submit MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) via the MGT603 Assessment 1 Part A - Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site.
  • Submit MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part B) via the MGT603 Assessment 1 Part B Discussion Forum link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site.

The Learning Facilitator will provide constructive feedback via the Grade Centre in the Student portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Learning Rubric: MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 1 Part A and Part B

Assessment Attributes

Fail

(Unacceptable) 0-49%

Pass

(Functional) 50-64%

Credit

(Proficient)

65-74%

Distinction

(Advanced)

75-84%

High Distinction

(Exceptional) 85-100%

Knowledge and understanding (technical and theoretical knowledge)

Understands theoretical models and concepts

Percentage for this criterion

25%

Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge

Key components of the assignment are not addressed.

Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are not addressed. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are not identified.

Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline.

Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.

Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.

Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed at very preliminary level. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used but at very superficial level.

Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.

Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.

Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed at appropriate level. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used with clarity.

Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s.

Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.

Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.

Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed comprehensively. Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used with high level of understanding.

A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s.

Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.

Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning. Stakeholders, goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are addressed thoroughly.

Tools and techniques of systems thinking such as Rich picture, Causal loop diagrams, etc. are used demonstrating mastery in the use of these tools.

Context,

Audience and Purpose

Percentage for

this criterion 

25%

Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.

Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.

Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment.

Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment.

Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment.

Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge

Percentage for

this criterion

25%

Limited synthesis and analysis.

Limited application/ Recommendations based upon analysis.

No critique on the peers’ posts. Just summarized the peers’ posts.

Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application.

Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature.

Critiqued on the peers’ post however, there is lack of depth and insight.

Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations

linked to analysis/synthesis.

Critiqued on the peers’ post with appropriate depth and insight.

Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis of new with existing knowledge.

Application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis.

Critiqued on the peers’ post comprehensively covering most of the missing aspect.

Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge.

Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed

models. Recommendations

are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. Critiqued on the peers’ post comprehensively covering most of the missing aspects with creative insights.

Effective

Communication

Percentage for

this criterion

15%

Difficult to understand, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. 

Information, arguments, and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical.

Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.

Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow.

Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the proposal and critique is logical, clear and well supported by evidence.

Expertly presented; the proposal and critique is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.

Assessment Attributes

Fail

(Unacceptable) 0-49%

Pass

(Functional) 50-64%

Credit

(Proficient)

65-74%

Distinction

(Advanced)

75-84%

High Distinction

(Exceptional) 85-100%

Correct citation of key resources and evidence

Percentage for

this criterion

10%

Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.

Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.

Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.

Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence.

Demonstrates use of highquality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence.

Diploma Universities Assignments

Laureate International Universities Assignment

Holmes Institute Assignment

Tafe NSW

Yes College Australia

ACC508 Informatics and Financial Applications Task 2 T2, 2019

ACC512 Accounting

ACC520 Legal Regulation of Business Structures Semester 2, 2019

ACCT20074 Contemporary Accounting Theory Term 2 Assessment 3

AERO2463 Computational Engineering Analysis : Assignment 4

B01DBFN212 Database Fundamentals Assessment 1

BE01106 - Business Statistics Assignment

BFA301 Advanced Financial Accounting

BFA504 Accounting Systems Assessment 3

BSB61015 Advanced Diploma of Leadership and Management

BSBADV602 Develop an Advertising Campaign

BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems case study

BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems Assessment Task 1

BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems Assessment Task 2

BSBCOM603 Plan and establish compliance management systems Assessment Task 3

BSBFIM501 Manage Budgets And Financial Plans Assessment Task 1

BSBHRM602 Manage Human Resources Strategic Planning

BSBINM601 Manage Knowledge and Information

BSBWOR501 Assessment Task 3 Plan Personal Development Plan Project

BSBMGT517 Manage Operational Plan

BSBWHS521 Ensure a Safe Workplace For a Work Area

BSBWRK510 Manage employee relations

BUSS1030 Accounting, Business and Society

CAB202 Microprocessors and Digital Systems Assignment Help

CHC40213 Certificate IV in Education Support

CHCAGE001 Facilitate the empowerment of older people

CHCAGE005 Provide support to people living with dementia

CHCCCS023 Support independence and wellbeing

CHCCCS025 Support relationships with carers and families

CHCCOM005 Communicate and CHCLEG001 Work Legally Ethically

CHCDIS002 Follow established person-centred behaviour supports

CHCECE019 Early Childhood Education and Care

CHCHCS001 Provide home and community support services

COMP10002 Foundations of Algorithms

COMP90038 Algorithms and Complexity

COSC2633/2637 Big Data Processing

COSC473 Introduction to Computer Systems

CPCCBC5011A Manage Environmental Management Practices And Processes In Building And Construction

CPCCBC5018A Apply structural Principles Medium rise Construction

CSE3OSA Assignment 2019

ELEC242 2019 Session 2

ENN543 Data Analytics and Optimisation

ENN543 Data Analytics and Optimisation Semester 2, 2019

FINM202 Financial Management Assessment 3 Group Report

Forensic Investigation Case Assignment ECU University

HA2042 Accounting Information Systems T2 2019

HC1010 Holmes Institute Accounting For Business

HC2112 Service Marketing and Relationship Marketing Individual Assignment T2 2019

HC2121 Comparative Business Ethics & Social Responsibility T2 2019

HI5002 Holmes Institute Finance for Business

HI5003 Economics for Business Trimester 2 2019

HI5004 Marketing Management T1 2020 Individual Report

HI5004 Marketing Management T1 2020 Group Report

HI5004 Holmes Institute Marketing Management

HI5014 International Business across Borders Assignment 1

HI5014 International Business across Borders

HI5017 Managerial Accounting T2 2019

HI5017 Managerial Accounting T1 2019

HI5019 Tutorial Questions 1

HI5019 Strategic Information Systems for Business and Enterprise T1 2020

HI5019 Holmes Institute Strategic Information Systems T2

HI5019 T2 2019

HI5019 T1 2019

HI5020 Corporate Accounting T3 2019

HI5020 Corporate Accounting T2 2019

HI6005: Management and Organisations in a Global Environment

HI6006 Tutorial questions

HI6006 Competitive Strategy Individual T1 2020

HI6006 Holmes Institute Competitive Strategy

HI6006 Competitive Strategy T3 2019

HI6007 Statistics for business decisions

HI6007 Assessment 2 T1 2020

HI6007 T1 2019

HI6008 T2 2019

HI6008 Holmes Institute Research Project

HI6025 Accounting Theory and Current Issues

HI6026 Audit, Assurance and Compliance Assignment Help

HI6026 Audit, Assurance and Compliance

HI6027 business and corporate law tutorial Assignment T1 2021

HI6027 Business and Corporate Law T3 2019

HI6027 Business and Corporate Law T2 2019

HI6028 Taxation Theory, Practice and Law T2 2021

Hi6028 taxation theory, practice and law Final Assessment t1 2021

HI6028 Taxation Theory, Practice and Law T2 2019

HI6028 Taxation Theory T1 2019

HI6028 Taxation Law Holmes

HLTAAP001 Recognise healthy body systems

HLTWHS002 Follow safe practices for direct client care

HOTL5003 Hotel Property and Operations

HPS771 - Research Methods in Psychology A

HS2021 Database Design

ICTICT307 Customise packaged software applications for clients

IFN619 Data Analytics for Strategic Decision Makers

INF80028 Business Process Management Swinburne University

ISY2005 Case Assignment Assessment 2

ISYS326: Information Systems Security Assignment 2, Semester 2, 2019

ITAP3010 Developing Data Access Solutions Project

ITECH1103- Big Data and Analytics – Lab 3 – Working with Data Items

ITECH1103- Big Data and Analytics Assignment Semester 1, 2020

ITECH 5500 Professional Research and Communication

Kent Institute Australia Assignment

MA5830 Data Visualisation Assignment 2

MGMT7020 Project Management Plan

Mgt 301 Assessment 3

MGT215 Project Management Individual Assignment

MIS102 Data and Networking Assignment Help

MITS4002 Object Oriented Software Development

MITS5002 Software Engineering Methodology

MKT01760 Tourism Planning Environments Assessment 4

MKT01760 Tourism Planning Environments

MKT01906 International Tourism Systems

MKT5000 Marketing Management S2 2019

MNG03236 Report Writing SCU

MRE5003 Industrial Techniques In Maintenance Management Assignment 4

MRE5003 Industrial Techniques In Maintenance Management Assignment 3

MRE5003 Industrial Techniques In Maintenance Management

Network Security and Mitigation Strategies Answers

NIT2213 Software Engineering Assignment

NSB231 Integrated Nursing Practice Assessment Task 1

Science Literacy Assessment 4

SIT323 Practical Software Development T 2, 2019

SIT718 Using aggregation functions for data analysis

SITXCOM002 Show Social and Cultural Sensitivity

TLIL5055 Manage a supply chain

TLIR5014 Manage Suppliers

USQ ACC5502 Accounting and Financial Management

UTS: 48370 Road and Transport Engineering Assessment 2

CHCAGE001 Facilitate the empowerment of older people

CHCAGE005 Provide support to people living with dementia

CHCCCS011 Meet personal support needs

CHCCCS015 Provide Individualised Support

CHCCCS023 Support independence and wellbeing

CHCCCS025 Support relationships with carers and families

CHCCOM005 Communicate and work in health or community services

CHCDIS001 Contribute to ongoing skills development

CHCDIS002 Follow established person-centred behaviour supports

CHCDIS003 Support community participation and social inclusion

CHCDIS005 Develop and provide person-centred service responses

CHCDIS007 Facilitate the empowerment of people with disability

CHCDIS008 Facilitate community participation and social inclusion

CHCDIS009 Facilitate ongoing skills development

CHCDIS010 Provide person-centred services

CHCDIV001 Work with diverse people

CHCHCS001 Provide home and community support services

CHCLEG001 Work legally and ethically

CHCLEG003 Manage legal and ethical compliance

HLTAAP001 Recognise healthy body systems

HLTAID003 Provide First Aid

HLTHPS007 Administer and monitor medications

HLTWHS002 Follow safe work practices for direct client care

Assignment 2 Introduction to Digital Forensics

MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 1

MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 2

Hi5017 Managerial Accounting T1 2021

HI6028 Taxation Theory, Practice and Law T1 2021

OODP101 Assessment Task 3 T1 2021

ITNE2003R Network Configuration and Management Project

Australia Universities

ACT

Australian Catholic University

Australian National University

Bond University

Central Queensland University

Charles Darwin University

Charles Sturt University

Curtin University of Technology

Deakin University

Edith Cowan University

Flinders University

Griffith University

Holmes Institute

James Cook University

La Trobe University

Macquarie University

Monash University

Murdoch University

Queensland University of Technology

RMIT University

Southern Cross University

Swinburne University of Technology

University of Adelaide

University of Ballarat

University of Canberra

University of Melbourne

University of Newcastle

University of New England

University of New South Wales

University of Notre Dame Australia

University of Queensland

University of South Australia

University of Southern Queensland

University of Sydney

University of Tasmania

University of Technology Sydney

University of the Sunshine Coast

University of Western Australia

University of Wollongong

Victoria University

Western Sydney University

Year 11 - 12 Certification Assignment

Australian Capital Territory Year 12 Certificate

HSC - Higher School Certificate

NTCE - Northern Territory Certificate of Education

QCE - Queensland Certificate of Education

SACE - South Australian Certificate of Education

TCE - Tasmanian Certificate of Education

VCE - Victorian Certificate of Education

WACE - Western Australia Certificate of Education