You have accurate discussion the use the pqrst mnemonic assess chest pain
| Criteria | HD | DI | CR | PS | FL | Max Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Explains Systematic Chest Pain Assessment using the PQRST Mnemonic | Identified all of the additional assessment data you would need to obtain and clearly explained how you would obtain this information. 13-15 marks |
11.5-12.5 marks
|
10-11 marks |
Provided a very superficial and/or inaccurate discussion of the use of the PQRST mnemonic to assess chest pain.
|
15 | |
| Identifies and Prioritises First Five Nursing Assessments or Interventions | Prioritised nursing care in accordance with current best practice And |
Clearly identified five safe and appropriate nursing assessments or interventions And |
In your report, you have: Clearly identified five safe and appropriate nursing assessments or interventions
10-11 |
7.5-9.5 |
And/or Demonstrated unsafe prioritisation of nursing assessments or interventions 0-7 |
15 |
| Explains the Pathophysiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome | In your report, you have: |
In your report, you have: Provided an accurate and detailed discussion of all of the relevant disruptions to normal physiology that occur in ACS. Most aspects of the discussion are specific to the patient in the case study. |
In your report, you have: Provided a mostly accurate and more detailed explanation of the most significant disruptions to normal physiological processes that occur in ACS. Some aspects of the discussion may not be specific to the patient in the case study. |
In your report, you have: Provided a broad and/or general overview of the main disruptions to normal physiological processes that occur in ACS. The discussion may include some minor inaccuracies. 7.5-9.5 |
In your report, you have:
|
15 |
| Linking Nursing Priorities to the Underlying Pathophysiology of ACS | 13-15 |
In your report, you have: |
Included rationales that mostly explain how the selected assessments or interventions relate to the underlying pathophysiology of the patient’s condition, but more detail is needed to establish clearer links.
|
Included mostly basic and/or brief rationales that make some tenuous links between the selected nursing assessments or interventions and the underlying pathophysiology of the patient’s condition. 7.5-9.5 |
15 | |
| Use of Evidence to Support the Discussion. | An extensive range of current and highly appropriate sources have been located, evaluated and integrated to substantially support the discussion.
|
A range of current and appropriate sources have been located evaluated an integrated into the discussion.
|
A range of current and appropriate sources have been used. The sources have been evaluated and used to mostly support the discussion, but further development is needed to better integrate sources into the discussion. |
The sources used only provide some support for the discussion. 10-12.5 |
0-9.5 |
20 |
| Academic Writing and Presentation | The report adheres to all of the presentation requirements stated in the Subject Outline There are no mistakes in grammar, spelling or punctuation.
|
There is use of formal language and correct nursing terminology throughout And
|
And/or There are some minor spelling mistakes and errors in punctuation |
The report adheres to most of the presentation requirements stated in the Subject Outline And/or There is some use of informal language and the use of nursing terminology could be improved. 5-6 |
And/or There are multiple errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar |
10 |
Referencing
|
And/or All sources cited-in text match those cited in the reference list. |
And/or APA guidelines for in-text referencing and the reference list are mostly adhered to, with 1 or 2 minor errors. 7.5-8 |
The majority of sources used have been explicitly acknowledged.
|
And/or There are 1-or two inconsistencies between the in-text the sources cited in text and those cited in the reference list. |
And/or APA referencing guidelines have not been adhered to in-text or in the reference list |
10 |
