Which evaluate the maxim the statement
Intro to Ethics – PHIL 200
Unit 3
Answer: How many people the action affects
Elizabeth likes drinking coffee from a certain company which treats its farmers poorly and pollutes the environment.How would a utilitarian classify Elizabeth's action?
Answer: Neutral
David is the wealthiest resident in his neighborhood. Some of his poorer neighbors have hacked his wireless internet so they can save money for more important things like food and health insurance. Many people say this action is immoral— that it’s a type of theft.How might it be evaluated by a utilitarian?
Tabitha’s neighbors are annoyed by the types of plants she grows in her yard. After several attempts at talking to her, digging up her plants in the night, and even running her out of the neighborhood, Tabitha’s annoying behavior has not changed. One neighbor suggests they just kill her. Most people would agree that such an action is clearly immoral.
How might it be evaluated by a utilitarian?
Which of the following represents rule utilitarianism?
Answer: Marie takes her son to the hospital after he gets injured playing with fire because she would do so for any injury.
Which of the following pairs of goods are directly comparable according to hedonic utilitarianism?
Answer: All of the answer choices are correct.
Choose the statement from Richard’s list that reveals a possible problem with utilitarianism. Answer: If I don’t donate, I’m responsible for the death of a child.
Rosemary has been asked to make a large donation to purchase mosquito netting to reduce the threat of malaria in Africa. Her husband suggests she take a utilitarian approach to the issue, so Rosemary makes a list of possible actions she could take.
Answer: People have a natural tendency to show favoritism toward loved ones.
Decisions are not made quickly because decision-makers must consider who will be affected. Which statement describes an advantage of utilitarianism?
According to Kantian deontology, which of the following would make an act permissible? Answer: My intention is good.
It doesn't violate the categorical imperative.
Answer: maxim
For Kant, what constitutes humanity?Answer:Faculties like reason and freedom
Which of the following best summarizes the formulation of humanity?How would a Kantian deontologist evaluate lying?
Answer: It is morally wrong because if everyone did it, nobody could be trusted anymore. How might a Kantian deontologist evaluate stealing?
Which of the following people would likely be satisfied with Kantian deontology?
Answer: Carl is looking for an ethical framework that considers a person's intentions.
Which of the following represents a potential problem for Kantian deontology?
Answer: Unintended effects have no impact on a person's moral character.
What would a Kantian deontologist say that Frank should do?
Answer: Frank should not take the medicine because stealing cannot hold up as universal law, regardless of the potentially good consequences.
Claire is helping her elderly neighbor, Ms. Flannigan, with some yard work. Ms. Flannigan has no close family and tells Claire that she is beginning to wonder who will get the small bundles of cash she has hidden throughout her large house. Ms. Flannigan even remarks that she cannot remember where she has hidden them all. After helping Ms. Flannigan, Claire goes inside to freshen up. In the bathroom she notices a large wad of cash tucked inside the medicine cabinet. Which action is supported by utilitarianism but intuitively seems unethical?
Answer: Claire takes the money and donates it to the food kitchen that feeds the community’s homeless population.
Which of the following people would likely be satisfied with utilitarianism?
Answer: Adelaide is looking for an ethical framework that takes future generations into consideration.
Answer: All of the answer choices are correct.
What is meant by the formulation of humanity?
Answer: It is morally wrong because it deprives a person of his or her humanity.
Which of the following considerations is important for a utilitarian when evaluating the morality of an action?
How would a Kantian deontologist evaluate an action?
Answer: By evaluating the relevant maxim
Jerome gets injured helping a distressed swimmer. Jerome dies, but the swimmer lives.
