This area of the profession map focuses on the knowledge required to take this evidence-based approach. it covers an understanding of evidence-based practice itself, as well as how to analyse and solve problems in order to understand the business problem that needs resolving. it also includes knowledge of how to use evidence in your work, such as using and commissioning research, using date and analytics, and exploring stakeholder needs and concerns.
|
---|
|
CIPD’s insight
The Profession Map – Evidence-based practice
More, now than ever, people professionals are taking an evidence-based approach to their work, using organisation data, research, stakeholder insights and perspectives as well as professional expertise to deliver work that’s impactful.
Evidence-based practice is, quite simply, taking an evidence-based approach to your work: using the right data and the right information in a structured way, to inform the decisions you take and the work that you do, because it leads to better outcomes.
This area of the Profession Map focuses on the knowledge required to take this evidence-based approach. It covers an understanding of evidence-based practice itself, as well as how to analyse and solve problems in order to understand the business problem that needs resolving. It also includes knowledge of how to use evidence in your work, such as using and commissioning research, using date and analytics, and exploring stakeholder needs and concerns.
https://peopleprofession.cipd.org/profession-map/core-knowledge/analytics-creating-value
Evidence-based practice for effective decision- making (April 2022).
At the heart of evidence-based practice is the idea that good decision-making is achieved through critical thinking and drawing on the best available evidence. Evidence- based practice leads to decisions and actions that are more likely to have the desire effect and are less reliant on anecdotes, received wisdom and personal experience – sources that are not trustworthy on their own. Evidence-based HR practice draws together published research and people analytics with professional expertise and stakeholder opinions.
https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/strategy/analytics/evidence-based-practice-factsheet
Please note that the purpose of this insight is to link you to CIPD’s research and evidence within the subject area, so that you can engage with the latest thinking. It is not provided to replace the study required as part of the learning or as formative assessment material.
Preparation for the Tasks:
At the start of your assignment, you are encouraged to plan your assessment work with your Assessor and where appropriate agree milestones so that they can help you monitor your progress.
Refer to the indicative content in the unit to guide and support your evidence.
You will also benefit from:
Reading the CIPD Insight, Fact Sheets and related online material on these topics as well as key research authors on the subject.
Your evidence must consist of:
Scenario
Task One – Report
Your first task is to write a report which provides the audience with an understanding of what evidence-based practice is and the strategies that can be taken for effective critical thinking and decision-making, you must ensure that you:
Assess a range of different ethical theories and perspectives and explain how understanding of these can be used to inform and influence moral decision-making. (AC 1.5)
Appraise different ways and approaches organisations can take to measure financial and non-financial performance. (AC 3.1)
Evaluate the concept of evidence-based practice including how it can be applied to decision-making in people practice. (AC1.1) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 450 words. |
---|
Evidence-based practice: Evidence-based practice is a simple concept that helps in applying the proof-based approach to our work by using the appropriate information and data in an organized format. In making the primary principle underlying evidence-based practice, excellent decisions are created by combining critical thinking and the finest accessible information. The basic purpose of evidence-based practice is to make the best judgments possible, which assists individuals in determining how much they can trust the data they have. (Gill, 2018).
Yes, an approach such as the rational model is quite beneficial in making sound decisions in the workplace. The fundamental drawback of a rational decision-making process is that it necessitates careful evaluation and deliberation of evidence, which takes time and makes this technique inappropriate for making good conclusions. |
Explain the principles of critical thinking including how you apply these to your own and others’ ideas. (AC1.3) Short references should be added into your narrative below. Please remember to only list your long references in the reference box provided at the end of this section. Wordcount: Approximately 400 words. |
---|
The term critical thinking is the ability to think more clearly and responsibly about what we need to do and what we need to focus on, which remembers one's capacity to draw on intelligent and autonomous reasoning, which aids experts in understanding the reasonable associations between thoughts, distinguishing, and assessing contentions, identifying irregularities and common errors in thinking, efficiently tackling issues, and taking note of the perceptible cues. When working for a company, the main principle of critical thinking is completeness, which is gathered by going through accessible factors. It aids in the collection of hidden assumptions, the examination of numerous causes and consequences, the comprehension of our prejudices and attitudes, and the questioning of the techniques used to get all the information. Critical thinking is important in people professionals because it allows them to think clearly and reflect on the ideas, views, and arguments of others in the workplace. It aids in the resolution of many difficulties by making better judgments and clarifying any misunderstandings amongst employees at work. The people professional map assists in taking an essential look at people functions within the organisation, allowing individuals to ask questions and ensure that they are giving their all for each activity held inside the organisation.
|
Staff survey: People professionals play a crucial role in supporting and explaining the survey process, as well as guaranteeing those essential insights are shared openly, to generate the most input for the employee survey. The staff survey model assists human resource professionals in expressing the main aim of the surveying, as well as why the business is doing the survey when it is undertaken for the workers. The staff survey approach aids in boosting employee retention, decreasing absenteeism, increasing productivity, improving customer relations, and increasing profitability. (Kotlyar and Karakowsky, 2014). ROI/ROE: The cost-benefit analysis tool is critical for determining which decisions should be adopted and which should be avoided. It is the process of adding up the possible rewards of activity and subtracting the entire cost of that action. Return on investment is a metric used to assess the likelihood of profiting from a certain investment. ROI is a cost-benefit ratio that analyses profits and losses. ROI is a metric used to assess the possible returns on investment. Skilled employees, for example, earn a £400.00 bounce. However, according to statistical statistics, a total of 245 employees are eligible for bonus pay. So, the total amount of money that the corporation would spend on bonuses is £ 98,000.00. The budget allotted was £75,000.00. The bonus amount should be decreased to meet the budget based on the cost-benefit analysis of the situation. Other incentive packages, both intrinsic and extrinsic, can also be utilized to recognize high-performing personnel. The corporation may also improve its performance by awarding staff with five and six-star ratings. Whereas, return on equity (ROE) is a financial performance metric that is determined by dividing net income by shareholders' equity. Return on equity (ROE) is a financial performance metric that is determined by dividing net income by shareholders' equity (Bhuiyan, Mahbubur Rahman and Osman Gani, 2015). |
Task Two – Quantitative and qualitative analysis review
Presented below are two sets of data. Firstly, review the absence data that is presented in Table 1 and provide analysis of it to show:
trends across departments
Present your finding using appropriate diagrammatical forms and make justifiable recommendations based on your evaluations.
Table 1 – Absence data
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Manager A | |||||
Feedback from 42 employees
|
|||||
Treats me with respect. | 29 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
Supports my work life balance | 12 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 14 |
Sets me clear work objectives | 4 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 22 |
Is supportive of my development | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 13 |
Is skilled at resolving conflict | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 32 |
Sets me clear work targets | 37 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Recognises when I do a good job | 28 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
Provides me with supportive advice | 4 | 4 | 11 | 16 | 7 |
Applies policies in a fair consistent manner | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 30 |
Is open to my suggestions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 |
Communicates clearly | 31 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Rewards me when I work over and above | 4 | 10 | 7 | 13 | 8 |
Enables me to put forward my views | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
Allows me to agree my work objectives | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 19 |
Upload the completed Learner Assessment brief, with both tasks completed, through the Assignments option in the Oakwood Learner Hub.
Task Two – Quantitative and qualitative analysis review
Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. (AC2.2) Wordcount: Approximately 200 words. |
---|
This pie chart shows the rating of the sum of the 5 values in percentage form from the perspective of the data being about the manager. The main findings from the pie graph show that 69.04% of employees want someone to treat them with respect, 28.57% of employees feel that supporting their job should be based on work-life balance, 88.09% of employees fully agreed to set clear work target, 66.67% of employees fully support to recognize employees for a good job, 73.80% of employees fully agreed to have clear communication, 9.52% of employees want to receive rewards for their work over and above and 4.76% of employees only support to enable them to put forward their views. |
References
Please provide your full reference list here. The Harvard method is preferable. |
---|
CIPD, 2020. People Profession 2030. [online] Available at: <https://www.cipd.co.uk/Images/people-profession-2030-report-compressed_tcm18-86095.pdf> Creately, 2022. The Ultimate Guide to Understanding the Force Field Analysis. [online] Available at: <https://creately.com/blog/business/force-field-analysis/> Jonassen, D., 2012. Designing for decision making. Educational Technology Research and Development, [online] 60(2), pp.341-359. Available at: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-011-9230-5#author-information> Kotlyar, I. and Karakowsky, L., 2014. Sources of satisfaction with high-potential employee programs. Journal of Management Development, [online] 33(10), pp.1035-1056. Available at: <https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JMD-08-2012-0113/full/html> Paul, R. and Elder, L., 2019. The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Riratanaphong, C. and van der Voordt, T., 2015. Measuring the added value of workplace change. Facilities, [online] 33(11/12), pp.773-792. Available at: <https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/F-12-2014-0095/full/html> Meghanathi, P. and Chakrawal, A.K. (2022) “An analytical study of liquidity and profitability: Analysis of selected oil and gas companies in India,” Journal of Social Commerce, 1(1), pp. 34–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.56209/jommerce.v1i1.2. YuSheng, K. and Ibrahim, M. (2019) “Service Innovation, Service Delivery and customer satisfaction and loyalty in the banking sector of Ghana,” International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(5), pp. 1215–1233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbm-06-2018-0142. |
Assessment Criteria Evidence Checklist
Assessment criteria |
Evidenced Y/N |
Evidence reference | |
---|---|---|---|
2.1 | With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods. | Y | Quantitative and qualitative analysis review |
2.2 | Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. | Y | Quantitative and qualitative analysis review |
2.3 | Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial implications of potential solutions. | Y | Quantitative and qualitative analysis review |
Declaration of Authentication
Declaration by learner
5CO02
Evidence-based practice
Assessment Criteria marking descriptors.
Assessors will mark in line with the following assessment criteria (AC) marking descriptors, and will indicate where the learner sits within the marking band range for each AC.
Please note that learners will receive a Pass or Fail result from the CIPD at unit level. Referral grades can be used internally by the centre.
Overall mark | Unit result |
---|---|
0 to 19 | Fail |
20 to 25 | Low Pass |
26 to 32 | Pass |
33 to 40 | High Pass |
Marking Descriptors
Marking grid and feedback for learner
Unit 5CO02: Assessor Feedback to Learner | |
---|---|
Centre number | 875 |
Centre name | Oakwood International |
Learner number (1st 7 digits of CIPD Membership number) | 8608825 |
Learner surname | Muteb |
Learner other names | Saeed |
TASK 2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
AC Number | Assessment Criteria | Date | ||
2.1 | With reference to a people practice issue, interpret analytical data using appropriate analysis tools and methods. | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here | Enter mark here | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) | Enter mark here | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) | Enter mark here | |||
2.2 | Present key findings for stakeholders from people practice activities and initiatives. | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here | Enter mark here | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) | Enter mark here | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) | Enter mark here | |||
2.3 | Make justified recommendations based on evaluation of the benefits, risks and financial implications of potential solutions. | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here | Enter mark here | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 1 (if applicable) | Enter mark here | |||
Please enter your Assessor feedback here for resubmission 2 (if applicable) | Enter mark here | |||
Total marks for TASK 2 | Enter total marks here | |||
Total marks for TASK 2 (resubmission 1 if applicable) | Enter total marks here | |||
Total marks for TASK 2 (resubmission 2 if applicable) | Enter total marks here |