Language:EN
Pages: 14
Words: 2609
Rating : ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Price: $10.99
Page 1 Preview
the japanese investor requires annual dividend

The japanese investor requires annual dividend

CAPITAL BUDGETING ANALYSIS REPORT TO LAM

REGARDING POTENTIAL INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY

Presented by:

GRETA BANYTE

This 34,722 square foot apartment building includes 60 units:

  • 4 bachelor units,

There is also on-site laundry and parking with 60 available spaces.

Currently the price of the rent is:

Percentage of Gross Income
Gross Income $553,980 $545,580 from rent and $8,400 from laundry
Vacancy Rate Reserve ($16,367) 3%
Gross Operating Income $537,613
Expenses: ($206,116) 37.2%

Taxes (rate: 1.189%)

$67,773

Insurance

$13.889
$21,264
$16,619 3%
$2,500
$16,619 3%

Off-site Manager

$22,159 4%

Reserves

$5,540 1%
$4,092
$2,160
$3,500
Net Operating Income $331,497 60%
  • Income from the rent on all 3 types of units (“Bachelor units”, “Singles”, and “1+1”) will increase by 2% per year, while the income from laundry will remain unchanged.

In this case the expected monthly rent from each type of unit and expected monthly income from laundry would be:

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Bachelor units $460-700 $469-714 $479-728 $488-743 $498-758 $508-773 $518-788 $528-804
Singles $523-850 $533-867 $544-884 $555-902 $566-920 $577-938 $589-957 $601-976
“1+1” $560-1000 $571-1,020 $583-1,040 $594-1,061 $606-1,082 $618-1,104 $631-1,126 $643-1,149
Coin Laundry $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700 $700
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Gross Income: $553,980 $564,892 $576,021 $587,374 $598,953 $610,764 $622,812 $635,100
Rent $545,580 $556,492 $567,621 $578,974 $590,553 $602,364 $614,412 $626,700
Laundry $8,400 $8,400 $8,400 $8,400 $8,400 $8,400 $8,400 $8,400
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Vacancy Rate Reserve $16,367 $27,825 $28,381 $28,949 $29,528 $30,118 $30,721 $31,335
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Expenses $206,116 $208,177 $210,259 $212,362 $214,485 $216,630 $218,796 $220,984
    • Value of the land: 55% ($3,135,000)

    • Value of the building: 45% ($2,565,000)

    • $855,000 will be paid by LAM in cash.

  • Loan of $4,275,000 (75% of the total listed property price):

    • Loan from Japanese bank: $2,137,500 (or ¥200,174,951):

      • Rate: 3%

  • Capital gain tax rate will be 34% (note: in California corporate capital gains are taxed the same as regular income).

  • Exchange rate: US dollar will appreciate by 1% against Japanese Yen in the beginning of 2011 (as of April 10th 2010, the exchange rate: 1USD = 93.6491 Japanese Yen)

2010 2011
Exchange rate: per 1 USD 93.65¥ 94.59¥
Cash Flow from Operations: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Gross Potential Income $564,892 $576,021 $587,374 $598,953 $610,764 $622,812 $635,100
- Vacancy Rate Reserve (5%) ($27,825) ($28,381) ($28,949) ($29,528) ($30,118) ($30,721) ($31,335)
= Gross Operating Income $537,067 $547,640 $558,425 $569,425 $580,646 $592,091 $603,765
- Operating Expenses ($208,177) ($210,259) ($212,362) ($214,485) ($216,630) ($218,796) ($220,984)
= Net Operating Income (NOI) $328,890 $337,381 $346,063 $354,940 $364,016 $373,295 $382,781
- Tax Payable1 at 34% ($10,744) ($14,637) ($18,636) ($22,746) ($26,968) ($31,308) ($35,768)
= Cash Flow from Operations $318,146 $322,744 $327,427 $332,194 $337,048 $341,987 $347,013
Cash Flow of Financing: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Loan from US Bank $2,137,500
+ Loan from Japanese Bank $2,137,500
+ Investment from Japanese Investor $570,000
= Total Cash Inflow From Financing activities $4,845,000
- US Loan Repayment: ($137,695) ($137,695) ($137,695) ($137,695) ($137,695) ($137,695) ($2,017,519)
Principal ($31,536) ($33,150) ($34,846) ($36,628) ($38,502) ($40,472) ($1,922,367)
Interest* ($106,159) ($104,545) ($102,849) ($101,067) ($99,193) ($97,223) ($95,152)
- Japanese Loan Repayment2: ($107,060) ($107,060) ($107,060) ($107,060) ($107,060) ($107,060) ($1,884,227)
Principal ($44,180) ($45,524) ($46,908) ($48,336) ($49,806) ($51,321) ($1,830,049)
Interest* ($62,880) ($61,536) ($60,152) ($58,724) ($57,254) ($55,739) ($54,178)
- Dividend to Japanese Investor3 (5%) ($28,500) ($28,500) ($28,500) ($28,500) ($28,500) ($28,500) ($28,500)
= Cash Flow of Financing $4,845,000 ($273,255) ($273,255) ($273,255) ($273,255) ($273,255) ($273,255) ($3,930,246)
Cash Flow of Investment: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Acquisition of Apartment Building ($5,700,000)
Projected Sales Price (10% ↑) $6,270,000
- Selling Expenses (5%) ($313,500)
= Adjusted Projected Sales Price $5,956,500
- Income Taxes from Sale (34%) ($392,445)
= Cash Flow of Investment ($5,700,000) $5,564,055
Total Cash Flow of Project: -$855,000 $44,891 $49,489 $54,172 $58,939 $63,793 $68,732 $1,980,822

In the following table “Tax Analysis” you can see how tax expenses, associated with the project, are calculated. You can see that depreciation and interest paid on loans lower the taxable income and, thus, lessen LAM’s income tax expense. This has an effect on the project’s cash flow from operations: as the tax expense decreases – cash flow from operations increases.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Net Operating Income $328,890 $337,381 $346,063 $354,940 $364,016 $373,295 $382,781
Depreciation ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250)
Interest Expense on Loans* ($169,039) ($166,081) ($163,001) ($159,791) ($156,447) ($152,962) ($149,330)
Operating Taxable Income $31,601 $43,050 $54,812 $66,899 $79,319 $92,083 $105,201
Tax Rate 34% 34% 34% 34% 34% 34% 34%
Income Tax Expense $10,744 $14,637 $18,636 $22,746 $26,968 $31,308 $35,768

In the table “Income Analysis” the tax expense on net income is reflected.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Gross Potential Income $564,892 $576,021 $587,374 $598,953 $610,764 $622,812 $635,100
Vacancy Rate Reserve (5%) ($27,825) ($28,381) ($28,949) ($29,528) ($30,118) ($30,721) ($31,335)
Gross Operating Income $537,067 $547,640 $558,425 $569,425 $580,646 $592,091 $603,765
Operating Expenses ($208,177) ($210,259) ($212,362) ($214,485) ($216,630) ($218,796) ($220,984)
Net Operating Income $328,890 $337,381 $346,063 $354,940 $364,016 $373,295 $382,781
Depreciation ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250) ($128,250)
EBIT $200,640 $209,131 $217,813 $226,690 $235,766 $245,045 $254,531
Interest Expense on Loans* ($169,039) ($166,081) ($163,001) ($159,791) ($156,447) ($152,962) ($149,330)
EBT $31,601 $43,050 $54,812 $66,899 $79,319 $92,083 $105,201
Tax Expense at 34% ($10,744) ($14,637) ($18,636) ($22,746) ($26,968) ($31,308) ($35,768)
Net Income $20,857 $28,413 $36,176 $44,153 $52,351 $60,775 $69,433
Year After-Tax Cash Flow of Project
Cash Outflow 2010 -$855,000
Cash Inflow 2011 $44,891
2012 $49,489
2013 $54,172
2014 $58,939
2015 $63,793
2016 $68,732
2017 $1,980,822

Where:

  • Re - expected rate of return on equity, or cost of equity

  • Rd - expected borrowing rate, or cost of debt

To compute the cost of equity the CAPM will be used. According to the model, the expected cost of equity (Re) is equal to:

I will calculate the cost of equity in two ways: using the risk-free rate and expected return on the market in USA and Japan. As LAM is located in USA, I will assume the company’s beta to be equal to the average beta of comparable US REIT companies. The data is provided in the table below.

USA JAPAN
Risk-free Rate of Return Rf 0.44%4 0.13%5
Expected Return on the Market Rm 12.3% 7.2%
Beta (average of REIT companies) β 1.60 0.92
  • Japan: E(Re) = 0.13% + 1.60(7.2% - 0.13%) = 11.44%

Thus, according to CAPM, the expected return on the equity is 19.42% in USA and 11.44% in Japan.

USA JAPAN
Interest Rate on Loan 5% 3%

As the project is assumed to be financed with 10% equity, 10% preferred stock and 80% debt, the WACC of the project is expected to be:

  • Applying the cost of equity of 19.42% using the information from US market:

In both cases, the weighted average cost of capital varies within narrow range, from 3.76% to 4.55%. To calculate the net present value (NPV) of the project the average discount rate of 4.16% will be used:

  • Applying the average cost of equity of 15.43% [= (19.42% + 11.44%) / 2]:

Year After-Tax Cash Flow of Project
Cash Outflow 2010 -$855,000
Cash Inflow 2011 $44,891
2012 $49,489
2013 $54,172
2014 $58,939
2015 $63,793
2016 $68,732
2017 $1,980,822
NPV = $926,726
  • Case 2: 5% decrease in Gross Operating Income: IRR = 10% NPV = $437,675

  • Case 3: 5% increase in Operating Expenses: IRR = 15% NPV = $786,701

As you can see, the increase in Gross Operating Income, decrease in Operating Expenses and appreciation of US dollar against Japanese Yen would cause the project’s IRR and NPV to increase. On the other hand, the decrease in Gross Operating Income, increase in Operating Expenses and depreciation of US dollar against Japanese Yen would cause the project’s IRR and NPV to decrease.

For more detailed calculations, please, look at the Excel sheet named “Sensitivity Analysis”.

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cash Flows in USD -855,000 43,810 48,408 53,091 57,858 62,712 67,651 1,961,789
Cash Flow in JPY -80,069,981 4,102,767 4,533,366 4,971,924 5,418,350 5,872,922 6,335,455 183,719,774

If we assumed that US dollar will appreciate against Japanese Yen by 1% every year, then the expected exchange rate would be:

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
JPY per 1 USD 93.65¥ 94.59¥ 95.53¥ 96.49¥ 97.45¥ 98.43¥ 99.41¥ 100.40¥

This would have an impact on loan repayment to Japanese bank, as assumed the payments are made in Japanese Yen. If US dollar appreciated against Japanese Yen, LAM would need less US dollars to pay the principal and interest on the Japanese loan. It means that the net cash flow generated from the project would increase. As you can see from the table below, the project’s total cash flow would be:

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cash Flow in USD -855,000 44,891 50,560 56,302 62,119 68,012 73,979 2,091,086
Cash Flow in JPY -80,069,981 4,246,240 4,829,997 5,432,580 6,053,497 6,694,421 7,354,252 209,945,034

Other way to hedge the exchange rate risk is to look for other sources to obtain Japanese Yen that could be used to repay the loan to Japanese bank. In this way, cash inflow in Japanese Yen would offset cash outflow in Japanese Yen.


  1. ↩︎

You are viewing 1/3rd of the document.Purchase the document to get full access instantly

Immediately available after payment
Both online and downloadable
No strings attached
How It Works
Login account
Login Your Account
Place in cart
Add to Cart
send in the money
Make payment
Document download
Download File
img

Uploaded by : Cindy Schmidt

PageId: DOCA8EC6AB