subedi_pranuja_essay by Pranuja Subedi
Submission date: 02-Oct-2018 06:30PM
(UTC+1000)
Submission ID: 1012238689
File name: human_relation.docx (17.98K)
Word count: 1260
Character count: 6858
SIMILARITY INDEX
|
STUDENT PAPERS
|
|
|
Submitted to Grand Canyon University
|
1% |
Student Paper
|
|
|
1% |
|
There were also quite a f ew ref erencing errors.
Please review the Ref erence Guide now and
whenever you are ref erencing your work.
Please see comments in text f or f urther f eedback.
PAGE 1
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. and why this inf ormation is relevant
to nursing practice.
Text Comment. Essays do not require headings. If you
were using headings, you would need something more meaningf ul than
"body".
can result in your work being investigated f or academic
misconduct.
This text matches another source. Greater paraphrasing required. Even
unintentional matches
can result in your work being investigated f or academic
misconduct.
Strikethrough.
Awkward expression.
This text matches another source. Greater paraphrasing required. Even
unintentional matches
Text Comment. Julie's
PAGE 3
can result in your work being investigated f or academic
misconduct.
Text Comment. versus
can result in your work being investigated f or academic
misconduct.
PAGE 4
the case study.
Text Comment. Ref erences?
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. Who was the author?
HIGH DISTINCTION Clear and concise introduction that identif ies the
developmental stage, highlights its (4.50) importance in the lif espan
and previews all points to be expanded on in the body of the essay. A
clear, concise and articulate conclusion that summarises all the main
points and draws insightf ul implications f or practice.
HIGH DISTINCTION Clear and concise introduction that identif ies the
developmental stage, highlights its (4.50) importance in the lif espan
and previews all points to be expanded on in the body of the essay. A
clear, concise and articulate conclusion that summarises all the main
points and draws insightf ul implications f or practice.
CREDIT A clear introduction that identif ies the developmental stage,
mentions its importance (3.50) and previews most points to be expanded
on in the body of the essay. A clear, detailed conclusion that
summarises most of the main points and makes some ref erence to
practice.
CREDIT A clear introduction that identif ies the developmental stage,
mentions its importance (3.50) and previews most points to be expanded
on in the body of the essay. A clear, detailed conclusion that
summarises most of the main points and makes some ref erence to
practice.
PASS A basic introduction that identif ies the developmental stage,
however its importance (2.50) in the lif espan is superf icial or
overlooked. Attempts to preview the essay, though some main points are
missing or unclear. Introduction may lack clarity due to grammatical
errors. A basic conclusion that attempts to summarise the main points,
though missing some main points and/or containing minor points/or too
lengthy.
Some brief ref erence to practice may or may not be included.
CRITERION 2 7.50 / 15
2.1. Identif ies and discusses the normative (usual) exmples of
pychosocial development f or age-group (0-6 months or 2-5 years). 2.2.
Draws on the work of a theorist(s) and apply knowledge to topic area
with examples. 2.3. Discussion is f ully supported by relevant
literature. 2.4. Makes ref erence to the Case Study scenario at lest
twice in providing examples or ref erring to hypothetical
possibilities.
HIGH DISTINCTION Essay conveys consistent evidence of synthesis in
discussion of the normative (14) psychosocial aspects of development f
or age-group (0-6 months or 2-5 years).
Draws on the work of a theorist, and application is highly integrated
into the discussion. Each point in the discussion is f ully supported by
relevant literature.
DISTINCTION Essay conveys consistent evidence of critical analysis in
discussion of the normative (12.50) psychosocial development f or
age-group (0-6 months or 2-5 years). Draws on the work of a theorist,
and application is mostly relevant to the discussion. Each point in the
discussion is supported by relevant literature. Makes clear and detailed
ref erence to the Case Study scenario at least twice in the
discussion.
DISTINCTION Essay conveys consistent evidence of critical analysis in
discussion of the normative (12) psychosocial development f or age-group
(0-6 months or 2-5 years). Draws on the work of a theorist, and
application is mostly relevant to the discussion. Each point in the
discussion is supported by relevant literature. Makes clear and detailed
ref erence to the Case Study scenario at least twice in the
discussion.
ref erence to the Case Study scenario at least twice in the
discussion.<br />
PASS Essay conveys some evidence of understanding within discussion
of the normative (9.50) psychosocial development f or age-group (0-6
months or 2-5 years), however this is largely descriptive, rather than
analytic. Draws on the work of a theorist, but application is not always
linked and/or relevant to the discussion. At least half the points made
throughout the work are supported by relevant literature. Makes
descriptive ref erence to the Case Study scenario at least twice in
discussion.<br />
FAIL Essay f ails to show adequate understanding of the normative
psychosocial aspects (3) of development f or age-group (0-6 months or
2-5 years) and/or Does not draw on the work of a theorist, and/or
application of theoretical material is inappropriate where used and/or
Less than half the points made throughout the work are supported by
relevant literature and/or No or limited use of literature to support
the discussion and/or Makes no ref erence to the Case Study or
inappropriate/ incorrect example is used.
FAIL Essay f ails to show adequate understanding of the normative
psychosocial aspects (2) of development f or age-group (0-6 months or
2-5 years) and/or Does not draw on the work of a theorist, and/or
application of theoretical material is inappropriate where used and/or
Less than half the points made throughout the work are supported by
relevant literature and/or No or limited use of literature to support
the
DISTINCTION Essay conveys consistent evidence of critical analysis in
discussion of inf luences on (7.50) psychosocial development f or
age-group 0-6 months or 2-5 years. Draws on the work of a theorist, and
application is clearly relevant to the discussion.<br />Very good
justif ication is provided explaining how understanding the topic
contributes to nursing and/or midwif ery practice. All signif icant
points in the discussion are f ully supported by relevant
literature.<br />
DISTINCTION Essay conveys consistent evidence of critical analysis in
discussion of inf luences on (7.50) psychosocial development f or
age-group 0-6 months or 2-5 years. Draws on the work of a theorist, and
application is clearly relevant to the discussion.<br />Very good
justif ication is provided explaining how understanding the topic
contributes to nursing and/or midwif ery practice. All signif icant
points in the discussion are f ully
PASS Essay conveys a descriptive account of inf luences on
psychosocial development f or (6) age-group 0-6 months or 2-5 years.
Draws on the work of a theorist, but application is not always linked
and/or relevant to the discussion. Satisf actory explanation<br
/>provided addressing how understanding the topic contributes to
nursing and/or midwif ery practice. Several points in the discussion are
supported by relevant literature, however other points are
unsupported.<br /><br />
PASS Essay conveys a descriptive account of inf luences on
psychosocial development f or (5.50) age-group 0-6 months or 2-5 years.
Draws on the work of a theorist, but application is not always linked
and/or relevant to the discussion. Satisf actory explanation<br
/>provided addressing how understanding the topic contributes to
nursing and/or midwif ery practice. Several points in the discussion are
supported by relevant literature, however other points are
unsupported.