Language:EN
Pages: 5
Words: 821
Rating : ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Price: $10.99
Page 1 Preview
profit sharing percentage and avg

Profit sharing percentage and avg

Case Study Description and Assignment Tasks

John Steed's Online Emporium (JSOE) is an online retailer that sells over 50 products to customers mainly based in Australia. Data has been obtained from JSOE's transaction system and placed into a Microsoft Access database file. The database contains: Product, Customer and Sales data.

Solution:

Picture above is the screenshot of excel window containing all the calculation required to answer the above question. In this we are assuming that Tara King will drop the product which has the minimum profit. Here I am considering average of profit percentage (profit percentage = (sell-cost)/cost)). So the list of products which Tara king will drop will be- Teavine, Chillinnium, Pingzilla, Flipher, Tubalum, Collarama. The same is highlighted in table and graph in the image.

Product name Sum of Profit Average of Profit Percentage Profit sharing
Teavine 110.10 % 1092348 117.27%
Chillinnium 190.34 % 449768 48.28%
Pingzilla 199.77 % 112789 12.11%
Flipher 209.26 % 161527 17.34%
Tubalum 214.56 % 502068 53.90%
Collarama 217.22 % 202526 21.74%
Product name Sum of Profit Average of Profit Percentage Profit sharing
Pingzilla 199.77 % 112789 0.11%
JuJu 316.58 % 128589 0.12%
Zensure 409.88 % 149892 0.14%
Calque 697.32 % 149892 0.14%
Flipher 209.26 % 161527 0.16%
Collarama 217.22 % 202526 0.19%
Lauralight 557.26 % 204748 0.20%
Jimbies 358.71 % 224152 0.22%
Blinq 481.17 % 229594 0.22%
Sarasida 314.81 % 242249 0.23%

From the Table 1, it is clear that products dropped by Tara King can be wrong choice, as those products are having comparatively good profit sharing. Here, profit sharing is the share of particular product’s profit in total profit. So, as per the profit sharing percentage Tara King can choose products from Table 2 for dropping, as they are having least profit sharing.

  1. A few months ago, a column named CustValueRating was added to the customer table. The rating values are intended to reflect the 'value' of the customer to the business based on sales history. A score of 1 indicates that the customer is highly valued while a score of 4 indicates that the customer is in the group that should be least valued by the JSOE. Emma Peel, JSOE's leading sales person has doubted the validity of the values in the database.

value rating No. of Customer Average of Profit Percentage Sum of Profit Profit sharing
1 115838 516.06 % 26046477 25.08%
2 118296 512.42 % 26386585 25.40%
3 114254 512.78 % 25501833 24.55%
4 115757 513.89 % 25937041 24.97%
  1. If Emma’s doubting is correct, create a new CustValueRating value and show the top 20 (or thereabouts) customers. Describe the method used to calculate new values.

Solution:

Customer Name Cust ID Category Sum of Profit Calculated category
Aaron Chandy 9542 3 20526 1
Aaron East 8258 4 17703 1
Aaron Hesoandez 3291 2 16833 1
Aaron Loera 3234 3 15192 1
Aaron Ruiz 1842 2 21345 1
Aasish Delta 9665 3 15200 1
Aasish Lin 3582 4 18112 1
Aasish Virgen 4021 3 22304 1
Abi Bayley 6662 3 17682 1
Abi Gonzalez 7511 3 21715 1
Abigail Gondwe 7633 2 21631 1
Abigail Graves 7758 1 14986 1
Abraham Furlong 4677 1 15816 1
Abraham Quiroz 3053 3 15156 1
Adam Bhandari 9073 1 20358 1
Adam Daza 6274 3 19343 1
Adam Downes 4979 3 20291 1
Adam Garcia 4211 2 16781 1
Adam Mariano 8338 2 15499 1
Adam Mckellar 7379 4 17258 1
Adam Nunez 417 1 18240 1

You are viewing 1/3rd of the document.Purchase the document to get full access instantly

Immediately available after payment
Both online and downloadable
No strings attached
How It Works
Login account
Login Your Account
Place in cart
Add to Cart
send in the money
Make payment
Document download
Download File
img

Uploaded by : Nicole Tucker

PageId: DOCEE2B097