Probable outflow of resources embodying economic benefits
Accounting Standard 29
Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
(In this Accounting Standard, the standard portions have been set in bold italic type. These should be read in the context of the background material, which has been set in normal type, and in the context of the ‘Preface to the Statements of Accounting Standards’1.)
(ii) Enterprises which are in the process of listing their equity or debt securities as evidenced by the board of directors’ resolution in this regard.
(iii) Banks including co-operative banks.
(viii) Holding and subsidiary enterprises of any one of the above at any time during the accounting period.
(b) in its entirety, except paragraph 67, for the enterprises which do not fall in any of the categories in (a) above but fall in any one or more of the following categories:
Where an enterprise has been covered in any one or more of the categories in (a) above and subsequently, ceases to be so covered, the enterprise will not qualify for exemption from paragraph 67 of this Standard, until the enterprise ceases to be covered in any of the categories in (a) above for two consecutive years.
Where an enterprise has been covered in any one or more of the categories in (a) or (b) above and subsequently, ceases to be covered in any of the categories in (a) and (b) above, the enterprise will not qualify for exemption from paragraphs 66 and 67 of this Standard, until the enterprise ceases to be covered in any of the categories in (a) and (b) above for two consecutive years.
Objective
The objective of this Statement is to ensure that appropriate recognition criteria and measurement bases are applied to provisions and contingent liabilities and that sufficient information is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements to enable users to understand their nature, timing and amount. The objective of this Statement is also to lay down appropriate accounting for contingent assets.
Scope
1. This Statement should be applied in accounting for provisions and contingent liabilities and in dealing with contingent assets, except:
(d) those covered by another Accounting Standard.
2. This Statement applies to financial instruments (including guarantees) that are not carried at fair value.
(b) taxes on income (see AS 22, Accounting for Taxes on Income);
(c) leases (see AS 19, Leases); and
9. This Statement applies to provisions for restructuring (including discontinuing operations). Where a restructuring meets the definition of a discontinuing operation, additional disclosures are required by AS 24, Discontinuing Operations.
Definitions
10. The following terms are used in this Statement with the meanings specified:
(a) a possible obligation that arises from past events and the existence of which will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the enterprise; or
(b) a present obligation that arises from past events but is not recognised because:
Possible obligation - an obligation is a possible obligation if, based on the evidence available, its existence at the balance sheet date is considered not probable.
A restructuring is a programme that is planned and controlled by management, and materially changes either:
(a) trade payables are liabilities to pay for goods or services that have been received or supplied and have been invoiced or formally agreed with the supplier; and
(b) accruals are liabilities to pay for goods or services that have been received or supplied but have not been paid, invoiced or formally agreed with the supplier, including amounts due to employees. Although it is sometimes necessary to estimate the amount of accruals, the degree of estimation is generally much less than that for provisions.
Recognition
Provisions
(c) a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
If these conditions are not met, no provision should be recognised.
Present Obligation
16. A past event that leads to a present obligation is called an obligating event. For an event to be an obligating event, it is necessary that the enterprise has no realistic alternative to settling the obligation created by the event.
17. Financial statements deal with the financial position of an enterprise at the end of its reporting period and not its possible position in the future. Therefore, no provision is recognised for costs that need to be incurred to operate in the future. The only liabilities recognised in an enterprise's balance sheet are those that exist at the balance sheet date.
Probable Outflow of Resources Embodying Economic Benefits
22. For a liability to qualify for recognition there must be not only a present obligation but also the probability of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits to settle that obligation. For the purpose of this Statement2, an outflow of resources or other event is regarded as probable if the event is more likely than not to occur, i.e., the probability that the event will occur is greater than the probability that it will not. Where it is not probable that a present obligation exists, an enterprise discloses a contingent liability, unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote (see paragraph 68).
Reliable Estimate of the Obligation
Contingent Liabilities
27. A contingent liability is disclosed, as required by paragraph 68, unless the possibility of an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is remote.
28. Where an enterprise is jointly and severally liable for an obligation, the part of the obligation that is expected to be met by other parties is treated as a contingent liability. The enterprise recognises a provision for the part of the obligation for which an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits is probable, except in the extremely rare circumstances where no reliable estimate can be made (see paragraph 14).
Contingent Assets
33. A contingent asset is not disclosed in the financial statements. It is usually disclosed in the report of the approving authority (Board of Directors in the case of a company, and, the corresponding approving authority in the case of any other enterprise), where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
34. Contingent assets are assessed continually and if it has become virtually certain that an inflow of economic benefits will arise, the asset and the related income are recognised in the financial statements of the period in which the change occurs.
Measurement
Best Estimate
Risks and Uncertainties
39. Risk describes variability of outcome. A risk adjustment may increase the amount at which a liability is measured. Caution is needed in making judgments under conditions of uncertainty, so that income or assets are not overstated and expenses or liabilities are not understated. However, uncertainty does not justify the creation of excessive provisions or a deliberate overstatement of liabilities. For example, if the projected costs of a particularly adverse outcome are estimated on a prudent basis, that outcome is not then deliberately treated as more probable than is realistically the case. Care is needed to avoid duplicating adjustments for risk and uncertainty with consequent overstatement of a provision.
40. Disclosure of the uncertainties surrounding the amount of the expenditure is made under paragraph 67(b).
Future Events
Expected Disposal of Assets
45. Gains on the expected disposal of assets are not taken into account in measuring a provision, even if the expected disposal is closely linked to the event giving rise to the provision. Instead, an enterprise recognises gains on expected disposals of assets at the time specified by the Accounting Standard dealing with the assets concerned.
Reimbursements
46. Where some or all of the expenditure required to settle a provision is expected to be reimbursed by another party, the reimbursement should be recognised when, and only when, it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received if the enterprise settles the obligation. The reimbursement should be treated as a separate asset. The amount recognised for the reimbursement should not exceed the amount of the provision.
51. As noted in paragraph 28, an obligation for which an enterprise is jointly and severally liable is a contingent liability to the extent that it is expected that the obligation will be settled by the other parties.
Changes in Provisions
52. Provisions should be reviewed at each balance sheet date and adjusted to reflect the current best estimate. If it is no longer probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, the provision should be reversed.
Use of Provisions
Application of the Recognition and Measurement Rules
Future Operating Losses
57. An expectation of future operating losses is an indication that certain assets of the operation may be impaired. An enterprise tests these assets for impairment under Accounting Standard (AS) 28, Impairment of Assets.
Restructuring
58. The following are examples of events that may fall under the definition of restructuring:
59. A provision for restructuring costs is recognised only when the recognition criteria for provisions set out in paragraph 14 are met.
60. No obligation arises for the sale of an operation until the enterprise is committed to the sale, i.e., there is a binding sale agreement.
63. A restructuring provision does not include such costs as:
(a) retraining or relocating continuing staff;
65. As required by paragraph 44, gains on the expected disposal of assets are not taken into account in measuring a restructuring provision, even if the sale of assets is envisaged as part of the restructuring.
Disclosure
66. For each class of provision, an enterprise should disclose:
67. An enterprise should disclose the following for each class of provision:
(a) a brief description of the nature of the obligation and the expected timing of any resulting outflows of economic benefits;
(b) an indication of the uncertainties relating to any outflow; and
(c) the possibility of any reimbursement.
Appendix A
Tables - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Reimbursements
The purpose of this appendix is to summarise the main requirements of the Accounting Standard. It does not form part of the Accounting Standard and should be read in the context of the full text of the Accounting Standard.
Provisions and Contingent Liabilities
Where, as a result of past events, there may be an outflow of resources embodying future economic benefits in settlement of: (a) a present obligation the one whose existence at the balance sheet date is considered probable; or (b) a possible obligation the existence of which at the balance sheet date is considered not probable. | ||
There is a present obligation that probably requires an outflow of resources and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of obligation. | There is a possible obligation or a present obligation that may, but probably will not, require an outflow of resources. | There is a possible obligation or a present obligation where the likelihood of an outflow of resources is remote. |
No provision is recognised (paragraph 26). No disclosure is required (paragraph 68). |
Decision Tree
Appendix C
Examples: Recognition
This appendix illustrates the application of the Accounting Standard to assist in clarifying its meaning. It does not form part of the Accounting Standard.
All the enterprises in the examples have 31 March year ends. In all cases, it is assumed that a reliable estimate can be made of any outflows expected. In some examples the circumstances described may have resulted in impairment of the assets - this aspect is not dealt with in the examples.
Example 1: Warranties
Conclusion - A provision is recognised for the best estimate of the costs of making good under the warranty products sold before the balance sheet date (see paragraphs 14 and 23).
Example 2: Contaminated Land - Legislation Virtually Certain to be Enacted
Example 3: Offshore Oilfield
An enterprise operates an offshore oilfield where its licensing agreement requires it to remove the oil rig at the end of production and restore the seabed. Ninety per cent of the eventual costs relate to the removal of the oil rig and restoration of damage caused by building it, and ten per cent arise through the extraction of oil. At the balance sheet date, the rig has been constructed but no oil has been extracted.
Present obligation as a result of a past obligating event - The construction of the oil rig creates an obligation under the terms of the licence to remove the rig and restore the seabed and is thus an obligating event. At the balance sheet date, however, there is no obligation to rectify the damage that will be caused by extraction of the oil.
Example 4: Refunds Policy
An outflow of resources embodying economic benefits in settlement - Probable, a proportion of goods are returned for refund (see paragraph 23).
Conclusion - A provision is recognised for the best estimate of the costs of refunds (see paragraphs 11, 14 and 23).
Example 5: Legal Requirement to Fit Smoke Filters
(b) At the balance sheet date of 31 March 2006
Present obligation as a result of a past obligating event - There is still no obligation for the costs of fitting smoke filters because no obligating event has occurred (the fitting of the filters). However, an obligation might arise to pay fines or penalties under the legislation because the obligating event has occurred (the non-compliant operation of the factory).
Present obligation as a result of a past obligating event - There is no obligation because no obligating event (retraining) has taken place.
Conclusion - No provision is recognised (see paragraphs 14 and 16-18).
Example 7: A Single Guarantee
Conclusion - No provision is recognised (see paragraphs 14 and 22). The guarantee is disclosed as a contingent liability unless the probability of any outflow is regarded as remote (see paragraph 68).
(b) At 31 March 2006
Example 8: A Court Case
After a wedding in 2004-05, ten people died, possibly as a result of food poisoning from products sold by the enterprise. Legal proceedings are started seeking damages from the enterprise but it disputes liability. Up to the date of approval of the financial statements for the year 31 March 2005, the enterprise's lawyers advise that it is probable that the enterprise will not be found liable. However, when the enterprise prepares the financial statements for the year 31 March 2006, its lawyers advise that, owing to developments in the case, it is probable that the enterprise will be found liable.
(a) At 31 March 2005
An outflow of resources embodying economic benefits in settlement - Probable.
Conclusion - A provision is recognised for the best estimate of the amount to settle the obligation (paragraphs 14-15).
Example 9A: Refurbishment Costs - No Legislative Requirement
Example 9B: Refurbishment Costs - Legislative Requirement
An airline is required by law to overhaul its aircraft once every three years.
Present obligation as a result of a past obligating event - There is no present obligation.
Example: Disclosures
An example of the disclosures required by paragraph 67 is provided below.
Example 1 Warranties
A manufacturer gives warranties at the time of sale to purchasers of its three product lines. Under the terms of the warranty, the manufacturer undertakes to repair or replace items that fail to perform satisfactorily for two years from the date of sale. At the balance sheet date, a provision of Rs. 60,000 has been recognised. The following information is disclosed:
Example 2 Disclosure Exemption
Appendix E
Note: This Appendix is not a part of the Accounting Standard. The purpose of this appendix is only to bring out the major differences between Accounting Standard 29 and corresponding International Accounting Standard (IAS) 37.
2. Onerous Contracts
IAS 37 requires that if an enterprise has a contract that is onerous, the present obligation under the contract should be recognised and measured as a provision. For this purpose, IAS 37 defines an onerous contract as a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it.
4. Contingent Assets
Both the Accounting Standard and IAS 37 require that an enterprise should not recognise a contingent asset. However, IAS 37 requires certain disclosures in respect of contingent assets in the financial statements where an inflow of economic benefits is probable. In contrast to this, as a measure of prudence, the Accounting Standard does not even require contingent assets to be disclosed in the financial statements. The Standard recognises that contingent asset is usually disclosed in the report of the approving authority where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.