Language:EN
Pages: 13
Words: 2510
Rating : ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Price: $10.99
Page 1 Preview
lifo and weighted average costing method

Lifo and weighted average costing method

Contents

Introduction 2

Valuation 7

Financial Decision Analysis 8

References 11

Introduction

This report is about analyzing the financial decision making of organizations in New Zealand by analyzing and interpreting their financial statements and also analyzing the operating environment of Maori/Iwi organizations.. For this report we have chosen two organizations, one is Maori organization named as Moana New Zealand Ltd which was formerly known as Aotearoa fisheries limited and other is Stanford Ltd. Both companies are two of the biggest companies in New Zealand in seafood and fishing industry. Though both companies are involved in seafood production, major difference lies in the value system on which business operates. While Sanford is more economically driven and wants to be world’s best seafood company, Moana New Zealand vision is to maximise Maori fisheries assets value. This difference arises due the difference in principles as Moana follows maori principles which are discussed in the report.

Financial Statement Analysis

Ratio Analysis

Table 1: Ratio Analysis for Moana New Zealand
Ratios 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1. Activity Ratio          
Inventory turnover ratio(Cost of Sales/ Average Inventory) 14.20 15.16 14.88 16.46 16.69
Account Receivables Turnover Ratio (Net Sales/ Average receivables) 10.34 9.66 8.97 9.00 9.24
           
2. Liquidity Ratio          
Quick Ratio ((Cash+Receivables+Marketable securities )/Current Liabilities) 0.56 0.49 0.51 0.50 0.35
           
3.Solvency Ratio          
Debt to Equity Ratio ( Total Liabilities/Total Equity) 0.24 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.24
           
4.Profitability Ratio          
Gross Profit Margin (Gross Profit/Net Sales) 26.06% 23.27% 22.94% 19.93% 20.52%
Return on Equity (Net Income/Total Equity) -1.49% 5.32% 3.91% 4.61% 4.41%

From the above table, we can make following interpretations:

  1. Inventory turnover ratio has increased from 14.20 to 16.69 from 2013 to 2017 which indicates improvement in inventory management system as it means inventory is getting sold at an increasing rate.

From the above table, it can be concluded that:

  1. Stanford’s working capital management system needs improvement as its efficiency ratios such as Inventory turnover and Accounts receivable turnover declined from 11.63 and 9.24 to 9.41 and 7.99 respectively from 2013 to 2017.

Comparison with industry averages

Table 3: Ratio Comparison for year 2017
  Moana Sanford Industry (Sanford Ltd (SAN.NZ) financials, 2018)
Inventory Turnover Ratio 16.69 9.41 6.75
Accounts Receivable Ratio 9.24 7.99 31.34
Quick Ratio 0.35 0.59 1.75
Debt to Equity Ratio 0.24 0.42 0.40
Gross Profit Margin 20.52% 23.49% 27.77%
Return on Equity 4.41% 6.51% 5.20%

Ratio Analysis for Year 2017

  1. Both companies have stable debt to equity ratio which is in line with industry average which means both companies are less risky and can utilize this in future to strengthen their capital structure.

  2. There is not much and significance difference in profitability ratios which shows Moana needs to increase their profitability where Stanford are providing better returns to their shareholders.

Dividend Ratio

Valuation

Table 4: For the Year ended 2017
    Moana Sanford
A. Cash Flow ($000) 19363 50280
B. Earnings ($000) 19260 37478
C. No. Of shares (000) 250 93626.735
D. CF/share ( A/C) 77.452 0.537026096
E. EPS ( B/C) 77.04 0.40
Table 5: Valuation Using Comparable Approach
  Using P/Cash flow Approach Using P/E approach
Moana Calculated Share price 1040.18 1162.53
Sanford Calculated Share price 7.21 6.04

As we can see in Table 5, Moana’s share value should lie between 1040.18 NZD and 1162.53 NZD as per relative valuation approach whereas Sanford share value is between 6.04 NZD and $7.21 NZD

Current Market price of Sanford share is 7.76 NZD which is greater than its intrinsic value.

Financial Decision Analysis

Inventory Method

There are various methods to value a company’s inventory including FIFO, LIFO and Weighted average costing method. Choice of method has significant impact on company’s liquidity and profitability as various methods result into different ending inventory and Cost of Goods Sold (Herath, 2018).

By analyzing both companies’ financial statements, it was found that both companies use weighted average costing method and state their inventory at net realisable value or cost whichever is lower (Sanford, 2017) (Zealand, 2017).

Receivable Management

Payables Management

Payables management include management of trade payables which includes amount company owes to its vendors. It is also an important component for working capital management as companies needs to analyze their terms of credit to forecast their needs for short term funds.

Both Moana and Stanford recognized trade payables at fair value and then measure them at amortized cost.

Maori/Iwi organizations Environment Analysis

  1. Tikanga: It signifies value system of maori people including priorities, rules and ways of doing business. These values set them apart from other organizations. These values include:

    1. Maori diversity

    2. Spirituality

    3. Generosity, hospitality, care and giving

Accounting standards and Reporting system: Maori organizations compliance requirements are same as of other organizations of New Zealand. Their financial statements are prepared with generally accepted accounting practice (GAAP) and comply with NZ IFRS i.e. New Zealand equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standards.

Therefore it can be concluded that financial considerations for Iwi/ Maori organizations are almost similar except the fact that their decisions are primarily driven by their culture and value system instead of economic considerations as they give more value to sustainability and environmental factors.

References

Nissim, D. &. (2001, March). Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(1), 109. Retrieved September 15, 2018

Sanford. (2017). Sanford Annual Report 2017. Sanford Limited. Retrieved Setember 17, 2018, from file:///E:/Research%20Pixie/Sanford-2017-Annual-Report.pdf

You are viewing 1/3rd of the document.Purchase the document to get full access instantly

Immediately available after payment
Both online and downloadable
No strings attached
How It Works
Login account
Login Your Account
Place in cart
Add to Cart
send in the money
Make payment
Document download
Download File
img

Uploaded by : Andrew Beltran

PageId: DOC5F6ADDF