Here are features the modified audit program the intervention

Evidence B, Week 2 Case Analysis Companion: Fighting Pollution with Data

First and Last Name
Date

This Case Analysis Companion is meant to help support your reading and prepare you to engage meaningfully with your group. This Case Analysis Companion will be collected and marked based on completion, but your responses will not receive TA feedback.

This document does not have suggested word counts. Write as much as you need to analyze the case and be prepared for your group meeting. Complete your Case Analysis Companion before your group meeting and have it on hand while you meet.

Part 1: Case Comprehension

Where the problem takes place
Who the problem impacts, and how it impacts them

Type here

This section is meant to help you think analytically about the case.

Bullet points or short phrases are fine to record your ideas.

In the 2nd year, auditors’ pay was to be tied to accuracy of their reports as verified

You may pause your work in this Case Analysis Companion.

6. Read the Case Sequel. Then revisit the steps in the Theory of Change. What kinds of evidence in the Sequel is linked in support or negation of the steps in this causal chain?

TOC	Evidence in Sequel
Better incentives for environmental auditors will lead to more accurate reporting of audit results.	Type here
If more accurate audit results are reported, then this will lead to firms expecting greater regulatory scrutiny.	Type here
If firms expect greater regulatory scrutiny, then this will lead to firms making pollution abatement efforts.	Type here
If firms make pollution abatement efforts, pollution emissions will be lower.	Type here

7. The researchers were interested in two specific outcomes of interest. In your own analysis, describe the findings in terms of these outcomes.