Further confirm the assumed robust-ness the gate
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Section 5.3 | 187 | |||||||||||
2.5 | gain |
|
||||||||||
2 | ||||||||||||
1.5 | ||||||||||||
Vout(V) | ||||||||||||
1 | ||||||||||||
0.5 | ||||||||||||
0 | ||||||||||||
0.5 | 1 |
|
2 | 2.5 | ||||||||
Vin (V) | (a) | Vin (V) | (b) | |||||||||
|
Simulated Voltage Transfer Characteristic (a) and voltage gain (b) of CMOS inverter (0.25 ∝m CMOS, VDD |
Problem 5.2 Inverter noise margins for long-channel devices | |||
---|---|---|---|
Derive expressions for the gain and noise margins assuming that PMOS and NMOS are | |||
long-channel devices (or that the supply voltage is low), so that velocity saturation does | |||
not occur. | |||
5.3.3 |
While we design a gate for nominal operation conditions and typical device parameters, we should always be aware that the actual operating temperature might very over a large range, and that the device parameters after fabrication probably will deviate from the nom-inal values we used in our design optimization process. Fortunately, the dc-characteristics of the static CMOS inverter turn out to be rather insensitive to these variations, and the gate remains functional over a wide range of operating conditions. This already became apparent in Figure 5.7, which shows that variations in the device sizes have only a minor impact on the switching threshold of the inverter. To further confirm the assumed robust-ness of the gate, we have re-simulated the voltage transfer characteristic by replacing the nominal devices by their worst- or best-case incarnations. Two corner-cases are plotted in Figure 5.11: a better-than-expected NMOS combined with an inferior PMOS, and the opposite scenario. Comparing the resulting curves with the nominal response shows that the variations mostly cause a shift in the switching threshold, but that the operation of the
![]() |
|
THE CMOS INVERTER | Chapter 5 |
2 |
---|
Vout(V) | 0 | 1 | V | in (V) | 1.5 |
|
2.5 |
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||||||||
0.5 | ||||||||||
0 | 0.5 | 2 | ||||||||
|
gate is by no means affected. This robust behavior that ensures functionality of the gate over a wide range of conditions has contributed in a big way to the popularity of the static CMOS gate.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
• |
|
||
• | |||
|
|||
• |
|
||