Assignment Help logo
support@assignmenthelp.net
Language:EN
Pages: 25
Words: 7488
Rating : ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Price: $10.99
Download Now
Page 1 Preview
extended unit outlineuncc justice and change globa

Extended unit outlineuncc justice and change global world semester

Extended Unit Outline – UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World

UNCC300: JUSTICE AND CHANGE IN A GLOBAL WORLD

EXTENDED UNIT OUTLINE (ATTENDANCE – STREAM 2)
Credit points: 10
Prerequisite units: UNCC100 Self and Community: Exploring the Anatomy of Modern Society or
PHCC102 Being Human or PHCC104 Ethics and the Good Life
Incompatible units: UNCC301 Humanity in Catholic History and Culture (International), UNCC302
Human Dignity in an International Context, PHCC320 The Just Society
Lecturer in Charge: Dr Zachariah Duke
Office location: 640.G.66 (Ground Floor, Edward Clancy Building, Strathfield)
Email: CoreCurriculum.Coordinator@acu.edu.au
Your tutor is your first point of contact in this unit. Your tutor will be leading the learning in your
classes and will mark and will provide feedback on assessment. Please contact your tutor via
email in the first instance. You can find your tutor’s email address on LEO.
The Lecturer in Charge is responsible for the overall running of the unit, including but not limited
to assessing Extension and Special Consideration applications (see below). Arrangements
can be made for a consultation in-person or via remote technologies; however, please contact
your tutor in the first instance.
For tutorial selection or clash enquiries, and all other general Core Curriculum enquiries, can
be directed to the Core Curriculum Admin Team, via the Core Curriculum – Student Contact
Form.
Unit rationale, description and aim:
‘Interdependence obliges us to think of one world with a common plan‘. (Pope Francis,
Laudato Si’’: On Care for our Common Home, p.122)
Pope Francis challenges us to extend our thinking across new ways in which the relationship
between self and community can be realised. In achieving a global consensus on the nature
of our relationship to each other and the world in which we live, Pope Francis calls for a
renewed emphasis on the dignity of the human person as the basis of all action, advocacy
and solidarity. Universal fraternity and aspirations for the common good begin with a basic
recognition that we need one another. In this unit you should develop your understanding of
the dignity of the human person within the context of a global community. You should
develop skills that may assist the cooperative efforts of government, business, faith groups,
Extended Unit Outline – UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World
Semester 1, 2022 – Attendance – (Stream 2) – Version 9 March 2022 Page 2 of 20
and not-for-profit agencies to achieve a more just and equitable world. On completion of this
unit you should have acquired the skills and knowledge to become an active agent for
change in an interconnected and interdependent world. This unit is the second of two units
which are part of the University Core Curriculum.
Mode: Attendance.
This unit requires you to attend a weekly two-hour tutorial class between weeks 1 and 5 of
the semester (either on campus or online), as well as complete online readings and activities
on the LEO unit site. Refer to Allocate+, ACU’s timetabling system, for your weekly allocated
tutorial class. There is no lecture for this unit.
Attendance pattern: Tutorials and online readings and activities.
Duration: Tutorial classes occur only during weeks 1 to 5 inclusive. You should anticipate
undertaking 150 of study for this unit, including class attendance, readings and assignment
preparation.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
On successful completion of this unit, you should be able to:

LO1 Explain how Catholic Social Thought principles are relevant to human communities, using
examples from their course of study. (GA1, GA4, GA5)
Analyse, from a global perspective, some key challenges to the realisation of the common
good, and the effects this has on human dignity. (GA2, GA4, GA8)
Apply their understanding of these global challenges to their local or professional community
LO2
LO3
Week
(commencing)		 Module and Topic Tutorial preparation and class activities &
Assessment
1
Monday, 28
February 2022		 Module 1: Unit
introduction, Laudato
Si’ and integral
ecology		 • Read Extended Unit Outline
• Familiarise yourself with the LEO unit site
• This week’s topics are Unit introduction, Laudato
Si’ and integral ecology
• ‘Meet-and-greet’ tutor and fellow unit
participants
• Complete Module 1 work in LEO
• Complete Module 1 readings through Leganto:
o Ferrara, Pasquale. 2019. “Sustainable
International Relations. Pope Francis’ Encyclical
Laudato Si’ and the Planetary Implications of
‘Integral Ecology.’” Religions 10: 1–20
o Gruijters, Rochus-Antonin. 2016. “Solidarity, the
Common Good and Social Justice in the
Catholic Social Teaching within the Framework
of Globalization.” Philosophia Reformata 81: 14–
31
o Hanby, Michael. 2015. “Gospel of Creation and
the Technocratic Paradigm: Reflections on a
Central Teaching of Laudato Si’.” Communio 42:
724–747
2
Monday, 7
March 2022		 Module 2: The
Sustainable
Development Goals
(SDGs)		 • This week’s topics are the SDGs around the
world and SDGs at ACU
• Complete Module 2 in LEO
• Complete Module 2 readings through Leganto:
o Everingham, Phoebe, and Natasha Chassagne.
2020. “Post COVID-19 ecological and social
reset: moving away from capitalist growth
models towards tourism as Buen Vivir.” Tourism
Geographies 22: 555–566
o Sachs, Wolfgang. 2017. “The Sustainable
Development Goals and Laudato si’: varieties of
Post-Development?” Third World Quarterly 38:
2573–2587
Week
(commencing)		 Module and Topic Tutorial preparation and class activities &
Assessment
Human Rights of Older Persons.” American
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 29: 1000–1008
o Cox, Carole. 2020. “The Sustainable
Development Goals and Aging: Implications for
Social Work.” Journal of Human Rights and
Social Work 5: 39–47
o Salyer, J. C. 2020. “The Denial of Human
Dignity in the Age of Human Rights under
Australia’s Operation Sovereign Borders.” The
Contemporary Pacific 32: 512–521
DUE: Assessment task 1: Reflective Task:
Monday, 21 March 2022, 11pm AEDT
5
Monday, 28
March 2022		 Module 5: Advocacy
and unit conclusion		 • This week’s topics are Environmental advocacy
and Social advocacy and unit conclusion
• Complete Module 5 in LEO
• Complete Module 5 readings through Leganto:
o Barclay, Lesley, and Gordon Gregory. 2018.
“Alliances and evidence: Building the capacity
and effectiveness of rural health advocacy in
Australia.” Australian Journal of Rural Health 26:
308–311
o Christie, Ian, Richard M. Gunton, and Adam P.
Hejnowicz. 2019. “Sustainability and the
common good: Catholic Social Teaching and
‘Integral Ecology’ as contributions to a
framework of social values for sustainability
transitions.” Sustainability Science 14: 1343–
1354
o English, Leona M., and Peter Mayo. 2019.
“Lifelong learning challenges: Responding to
migration and the Sustainable Development
Goals.” International Review of Education 65:
213–231
o Flenadya, Vicki J., et al. 2020. “Stillbirth in
Australia 1: The road to now: Two decades of
stillbirth research and advocacy in Australia.”
Women and Birth 33: 506–513
Future weeks N/A DUE: Assessment task 2: Analytic Task:
Tuesday, 19 April 2022, 11pm AEST
DUE: Assessment task 3: Applied Task: Friday,
27 May 2022, 11pm AEST
There are no tutorial classes scheduled in weeks 6-12.

Extended Unit Outline – UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World
Semester 1, 2022 – Attendance – (Stream 2) – Version 9 March 2022 Page 8 of 20
ASSESSMENT STRATEGY AND RATIONALE
The assessment tasks in this unit are designed to build the students’ engagement with the material
in a progressive way, in order to assist them in meeting the unit Learning Outcomes. These tasks
lead the students through the increasingly complex phases of explanation and reflection, analysis,
and finally application.
The assessment structure will remain consistent across all modes of offering. Some flexibility may
be exercised in the options available to students, consistent with achieving the learning outcomes
and meeting the Graduate Attributes.
The first task serves to remind students of the principles of Catholic social thought (CST), and
invites them to reflect upon these principles especially in the context of reflection on how they relate
to their course of study at ACU. As a lightly weighted and early task, it serves to consolidate and
orientate the students to the more focused work to come.
The second task is linked to the units’ focus on global perspectives, and requires the students to
analyse the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in light of Catholic social thought. As a
more challenging task, this assessment piece is more strongly weighted, and it helps pave the way
toward the final task that has a focus on the demonstration of ‘deep’ learning.
The final assessment task is designed to build on these first two by assessing students’ ability to
creatively apply their understanding of CST and the SDGs to a local community. As such, it requires
students to show how the principles and aspirations they have studied in the unit can be applied
concretely in real contexts in ways that make a difference to the lives of people. Consequently, this
task is the most heavily weighted of the three.
ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION, MARKING AND RETURN
Electronic submission, marking and return through Turnitin/LEO is being used for this unit.

ASSESSMENT TASK 1: REFLECTIVE TASK
, i.e., the degree program you are enrolled in at ACU, e.g., Bachelor of Primary Education, Bachelor
of Nursing, Bachelor of Business, etc.
Extended Unit Outline – UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World
Semester 1, 2022 – Attendance – (Stream 2) – Version 9 March 2022 Page 9 of 20
You will do this using the format of short responses to FOUR questions/statements (200 words per
question/statement):
1. Discuss how Laudato Si’ represents the CST principle of human dignity.
2. Discuss how Laudato Si’ represents the CST principle of the common good.
3. Explore TWO other CST principles that are represented in Laudato Si’.
4. Critically analyse how Laudato Si’ and the CST principles relate to the course of study (i.e., the
degree program you are enrolled in at ACU, e.g., Bachelor of Primary Education, Bachelor of
Nursing, Bachelor of Business, etc.) you are currently studying.
Further instructions:
a) Refer to ONE reading from your course of study, i.e., the degree program you are enrolled in at
ACU, e.g., Bachelor of Primary Education, Bachelor of Nursing, Bachelor of Business, etc.
b) Refer to the fourth chapter of Laudato Si’: “Integral Ecology” (137–162).

Due date:
Weighting:
Length and/or format:
Purpose:		 Monday, 21 March 2022, 11pm AEDT
20%
800 words
Students reflect on how the Catholic Social Thought principles
relate to what they are learning in their course of study.
LO1
Learning outcomes assessed:
How to submit: This assessment task must be submitted electronically via
Turnitin on LEO.
This assessment task will be graded electronically, and your
mark will be provided on LEO. An announcement will be posted
on LEO when your mark is available.
Please refer to Appendix A at the end of the extended unit outline
for further details on the assessment criteria/rubric for this
assessment item.
Return of assignment:
Assessment criteria:
Due date:
Weighting:
Length and/or format:
Purpose:		 Friday, 27 May 2022, 11pm AEST
50%
1,600 words
Students apply their understanding of the Sustainable
Development Goals in a local community, by drawing on the
skills and knowledge from their course of study.
LO1, LO2, LO3
This assessment task must be submitted electronically via
Turnitin on LEO.
This assessment task will be graded electronically, and you will
receive your mark and written feedback via Turnitin. An
announcement will be posted on LEO when your mark is
available.
Please refer to Appendix C at the end of the extended unit
outline for further details on the assessment criteria/rubric for this
assessment item.
Learning outcomes assessed:
How to submit:
Return of assignment:
Assessment criteria:
UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World
Assessment Task 1: Reflective Task (20%)
Marking Rubric
Criteria Grades and grade descriptors from ACU Assessment Policy
Fail (NN)
Did not provide an
acceptable standard of
learning achievement		 Pass (PA)
Acceptable standard of
learning achievement		 Credit (CR)
Sound standard
of learning
achievement		 Distinction (DI)
High quality
standard of
learning
achievement		 High Distinction
(HD)
Exceptionally
high-quality
standard of
learning
achievement
Criterion 1:
Clear usage
and
understanding
of how
Laudato Si’
(specifically
chapter 4)
relates to the
prescribed
and chosen
CST principles
(8 marks)		 Did not provide an
acceptable standard of
clear usage and
understanding of how
Laudato Si’
(specifically chapter 4)
relates to the
prescribed and chosen
CST principles		 Acceptable usage and
understanding of how
Laudato Si’ (specifically
chapter 4) relates to the
prescribed and chosen
CST principles		 Sound usage and
understanding of
how Laudato Si’
(specifically
chapter 4) relates
to the prescribed
and chosen CST
principles		 High quality
usage and
understanding
of how Laudato
Si’ (specifically
chapter 4)
relates to the
prescribed and
chosen CST
principles		 Exceptionally
high-quality
usage and
understanding
of how Laudato
Si’ (specifically
chapter 4)
relates to the
prescribed and
chosen CST
principles
Criterion 2:
Depth and
precision of
linkage,
engagement,
and
application to
course of
study
(6 marks)		 Did not provide an
acceptable level of
depth and precision of
linkage, engagement,
and application to
course of study		 Acceptable depth and
precision of linkage,
engagement, and
application to course of
study		 Sound depth and
precision of
linkage,
engagement, and
application to
course of study		 High quality
depth and
precision of
linkage,
engagement,
and application
to course of
study		 Exceptionally
high-quality
depth and
precision of
linkage,
engagement,
and application
to course of
study
Criterion 3:
Structuring of
responses and
clarity and
coherence of
written
expression
(4 marks)		 Did not provide an
acceptable standard of
structuring of
responses; did not
provide an acceptable
level of clarity and
coherence of written
expression		 Acceptable structuring of
responses; acceptable
level of clarity and
coherence of written
expression		 Sound structuring
of responses;
sound level of
clarity and
coherence of
written
expression		 High quality
structuring of
responses; high
quality level of
clarity and
coherence of
written
expression		 Exceptionally
high-quality
structuring of
responses;
exceptionally
high-quality
level of clarity
and coherence
of written
expression
Criterion 4:
Referencing
and citing
resources
appropriately
(2 marks)		 Did not provide
acceptable use of a
reputable referencing
style; inadequate
application of a
reputable referencing
system; inadequate
citing of resources		 Acceptable use of a
reputable referencing
style; many
inconsistencies with
reputable referencing
system; acceptable citing
of resources		 Sound use of a
reputable
referencing style;
several
inconsistencies
with reputable
referencing
system; sound
citing of
resources		 High quality use
of a reputable
referencing
style; some
inconsistencies
with reputable
referencing
system; high
quality citing of
resources		 Exceptionally
high-quality use
of a reputable
referencing
style; exemplary
presentation of
a reputable
referencing
system;
exceptionally
high-quality
citing of
resources

Extended Unit Outline – UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World
Semester 1, 2022 – Attendance – (Stream 2) – Version 9 March 2022 Page 17 of 20
Appendix B: Marking Rubric for Assessment Task 2: Analytic Task

Extended Unit Outline – UNCC300: Justice and Change in a Global World
Semester 1, 2022 – Attendance – (Stream 2) – Version 9 March 2022 Page 18 of 20

(3 marks) acceptable use of
a reputable
referencing style;
inadequate
application of a
reputable
referencing
system;
inadequate citing
of resources		 many
inconsistencies
with reputable
referencing
system; acceptable
citing of resources		 several
inconsistencies
with reputable
referencing
system; sound
citing of resources		 some
inconsistencies
with reputable
referencing
system; high
quality citing of
resources		 a reputable
referencing style;
exemplary
presentation of a
reputable
referencing
system;
exceptionally high
quality citing of
resources
4; and c) the
two selected
articles (from
the 4 options).
(12 marks)
Criterion 6:
Referencing
(4 marks)		 Did not provide use of a
reputable referencing
style; inadequate
application of a
reputable referencing
system		 Acceptable use of a
reputable referencing
style; many
inconsistencies with
reputable referencing
system		 Sound use of a
reputable
referencing style;
several
inconsistencies
with reputable
referencing
system		 High quality use
of a reputable
referencing
style; some
inconsistencies
with reputable
referencing
system		 Exceptionally
high-quality
use of a
reputable
referencing
style;
exemplary
presentation of
a reputable
referencing
system

You are viewing 1/3rd of the document.Purchase the document to get full access instantly

Immediately available after payment
Both online and downloadable
No strings attached
How It Works
Login account
Login Your Account
Place in cart
Add to Cart
send in the money
Make payment
Document download
Download File
img

Uploaded by : Breno Novaes

PageId: DOC7A0EC16

©2009-2024 Assignmenthelp.net