Example of lean approach in public management report
Example Of Lean Approach In Public Management Report
Introduction
The lean approach is developed in Toyota production plants which aims at eliminating wastes in the production according to the needs of the final consumer. This way production can be less costly by using less resources. This Japanese way of production attracts many institutions and they would like to employ this approach to their business. Furthermore, even the public institutions are interested in the Lean Approach.
A manager follows lean approach which brings the followings basically into organizations:
– Determining the value desired by the beneficiaries of a public
service,
– Identifying the value line for each public good and service,
– Guaranteing a continuous flow of public goods and services,
– Creating solutions in case of failures,
– Perfecting public goods and services provided.
The lean approach developed to business management in public
institutions are distinctively different from private companies and more
inefficient comparatively. Because public institutions are not elastic
enough to change their processes or even it can be questioned that
public institutions might create a soul to apply this approach to their
business.
There are many reasons behind inefficient management in public
institutions, however, the most essential one is that a business run by
a public institution is regulated according to some legal documents and
these legislations are mostly very much determining the business
environment. Public institution responsibles, in general, care more
about doing business compatible with legislations. This motivation leads
them into a thinking of not taking major risks. The risk averse approach
causes inefficiencies in business. As we know, to be able to get higher
efficience or higher profits in any business, one should be able take
higher risks under control. In another words, managing higher risks
gives higher profits. On the other hand, the lean approach provides a
certain way of management which might guarantee some benefits in public
management.
In this essay, I will explain how legislations influence business
management, how risk averse approach causes inefficiency, and how lean
approach might cause some failures. There are some mechanisms which
might cause inefficiency at public workplace due to some problems
stemming from approach to business: risk averse approach of managers,
defining vision and mission, defining work processes, improving
processes, taking responsibility behavior, recruiting process, and
motivating workers.
Risk Averse Approach of Managers
Defining Vision
Defining Processes
Improvement of Processes
Taking responsibility
The tasks are probably are determined by the management according to
the relevant legislations and in case of any failure, none of the
managers or the workers will be taken as responsible, instead the
legislations will be questioned. Especially in the developed countries,
people sue public officers even for little issues, the public officers
become more alert about completing what is given (Hines and Lethbridge,
2008).
The most astonishing example of this is the universities in the
developing countries. The professors in these countries prefer staying
away from the industries, and they prefer teaching for long hours.
Because when a professor involves with a company, many people and public
managers might blame him for corruption. In this case teaching long
hours is less risky. Even we see that the academic promotion system
forces professors to stay away from industries. Writing a few article on
theoretical issues and publishing them in international journals
collects more points for professors more than advising a company.
However, this kind of university system creates inefficient universities
which cannot compete against international universities (Alp, 2001).
Recruitment Processes
In public business, recruitment process are done according to the
legislations. Even a public manager wants to develop business, he might
not be able to hire the workers he needs for the development. Instead,
he has to work with the people hired out of his control. Another
important problem with recruitments in public, even in some developed
countries, is the recruitment policies not depending on workers’
competencies. For instance, a diploma or a few certificate can be
decision rule in a hiring process and many very well experienced workers
might not be hired. In a private company, the manager can decide to hire
a person with experience without any diploma and any certificate.
Another problem in recruitment process is a psychological one. Mostly
managers in public does not want a possible manager candidate, and
because of this, they might refuse hiring very high quality workers.
Actually this problem has a reflection on workers’ side: a high quality
worker probably will not be willing to work under a manager like that,
so he will not be a candidate for public jobs.
Considering risk averse public managers, recruitment processes, in
general, does follow the legislations, instead of taking responsibility
and hiring more competent people to develop the business.


