Destination marks reference details complete

Case study
by Samiksha GURUNG

Submission date: 04-Oct-2019 10:52PM (UTC+1000)
Submission ID: 1185515108
File name: ITS-Case_Study.docx (624.25K)
Word count: 3084
Character count: 16283

ORIGINALITY REPORT

14%

PRIMARY SOURCES

2

3

Student Paper

4

Submitted to University of Reading

5

6

Internet Source

7

María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández, Daniel

Student Paper

11

Submitted to University of Brighton

<1%

12

13

www.google.ch

<1%

14

15

Submitted to York St John University

<1%

16

17

Submitted to Mont Blanc Palace

<1%

18

Exclude quotes	On	Exclude matches
		Exclude matches

GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE

Very good work with clarity and comprehensiveness.

The conclusion part needs further development. Would be good

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

	Comment 2

Good application of theory

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

	39.80 / 50
	3 / 4

Logical discussion and argument (4 marks)

EXCELLENT

VERY GOOD	Excellent attention to writing, spelling and grammar. Reader can easily move through document and clearly understand meaning

UNSATISFACTORY (0.50) INTRODUCTION

EXCELLENT (2) VERY GOOD

VISITATION 4 / 4 International tourism visitation analysis (4 marks)

EXCELLENT (4)

(2.50)

SATISFACTORY		0 / 5

UNSATISFACTORY
UNSATISFACTORY
(0.50)
(0.50)	analysing trends or markets to show importance of location to market groups.

attractiveness

VERY GOOD (4)	Strong discussion of attractiveness including knowledge of tourism system, motivation or satisfaction theories to showcase location. Reasonable discussion of attractiveness with chance to discuss tourism system, motivation or satisfaction theories with showcas

EXCELLENT (12) VERY GOOD (9)

UNSATISFACTORY (4) IMPACTS

Critical analysis of impacts from tourism activity on host community (8 marks)

Critical analysis of one policy issues for the destination (8 marks)

(6)

GOOD Policy implications linked with tourism with chance to improve. (5)

UNSATISFACTORY	Weak effort at demonstrating policy implications for tourism and implications for


REFERENCES

Referencing (2 marks)

(1.30)
SATISFACTORY More attention needed to show full source of information to develop consistency.

(1)
UNSATISFACTORY Inconsistent and incorrect referencing provided. Reader would be unable to locate source.

	0.80 / 1