- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 4 years, 10 months ago by
.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
-
Posts
-
In Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993) (http://laws.findlaw.com/us/508/366.html) the Court officially recognized the use of the plain touch doctrine in law enforcement. Is the plain touch doctrine reasonable? Should police officers be allowed to “manipulate” objects that can be readily felt? Has the Court gone “too far” with this doctrine, or do you believe it is not a threat to Fourth Amendment protections?
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.