Language:EN
Pages: 12
Rating : ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Price: $10.99
Page 1 Preview
adequate format and use language some results figu

Adequate format and use language some results figures

COURSE Project (30%)

Table of Contents

1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3

5. Overall Course Grading Scale ........................................................................................ 7

6. Group formation ............................................................................................................. 7

11.Student Assessment Rubric ......................................................................................... 10

Page2

•Incorporate appropriate engineering standards and addresses multiple realistic constraints.

•Apply both analysis and synthesis in the engineering design process, resulting in designs that meet the desired needs.

Figure 1. Reference brew pressure an espresso(a) Elements of the espresso machine system (b)

Page3

0 1 0
•𝐴= [
0 1
−𝑎0 −𝑎1 −𝑎2

0•𝐵= [ 0

]

•𝐶= [1 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
𝒂𝟎 20 150 50 160 10 180 15 200 30 220
𝒂𝟏 100 110 300 120 80 140 100 150 130 160
𝒂𝟐 100 120 200 130 110 150 150 170 120 140

Section Nr 𝒃
F1 1
F2 2
F3 3
M1 4
M2 5
M4 6
U1 7

The desired behavior of the controlled system should satisfy the following constraints: • The steady state error should be zero.

4.Calculate the steady state errors for:

Page4

6.How can we choose the value of K to get less than 10% of steady-state error?

7.We want now to use the Ziegler and Nichols methods to tune our PID controller. a.Which method (first or second) is to be used for this system? Justify your answer. b.Use the Ziegler and Nichols method that you identified in question 7.a and tune 3 controllers for your system: P, PI and PID.

Figure 3. PID control system on MATLAB/ Simulink

7.Compare the results obtained by this method with the results obtained in question 7 and draw your conclusions.

Page6

c.Design a controller to meet specifications in time and frequency domain [1,2]. d.Use computer-aided tools for control system analysis and design [1,2].

e.Function on multidisciplinary team to attain the ability of [3,4,5,7]:
-Acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.

Weight
Project PD 1: Theoretical Analysis 15%
PD 2.A: Simulation Results 10%
PD 2.B: Q&A 5%
Total
30%

Students may be asked to work in groups to complete certain assignments. Depending on the needs of the course, the faculty may arrange the groups and inform students on Moodle in advance.

PD: Project Deliverable

Important notes:

Students of each class need to form project groups (Group 2-3)

Deliverable 1 (PD 1- 15%): Theoretical Analysis (Due date is week 6 – 18/07/2024-11:59PM):

•Based on the variable parameters, each group of students will be working on a different

and hand calculations.

•Students need to bring justification for each result.

•An electronic copy of the report must be submitted through Moodle (Turnitin) on the

due date.

•The presentation is to last 5 minutes and is followed by 5-10 minutes of discussion period. •All presentations must be done using presentation software like MS PowerPoint. An

electronic copy of the presentation must be submitted through Moodle prior to the

-General questions of the concept of PID controllers

8.Academic Integrity and AI Utilization

for their assignments. The following web site is of value for

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/. Students are also encouraged to visit the AUM

Page8

For all collaborative projects, the entire team bears collective responsibility for the outcome and deliverables of the project. However, certain sections of the project may be evaluated on an individual basis, in accordance with the project's specific requirements as outlined in the project documentation.

Page9

EE 382
Project Deliverable 1 (Theoretical Analysis (15%)) Grading Rubric
Unsatisfactory Developing Satisfactory
Excellent
(0-59%) (60%-74%) (75%-87%) (>88%)

• The report covers •the report covers an

Theoretical some theoretical important part of the

calculation

• no (or wrong) hand

• no (or wrong) hand
• all hand calculations are
calculation is provided

provided with all steps

provided

• brief conclusion and

of the project are

of the project are

that summarizes the work
discussion.

• future work is not

• future work is not

• future work is well • excellent future work is

provided.

conclusion

(30%)

been done between

theoretical results.

theoretical results but did not cover all simulation results.

PD2.A (10%): Simulation Results (Project Presentation):

EE 382
Project Deliverable 2.A (Project Presentation (10%)) Grading Rubric

Simulation
results (50%)- Group

Graphs are not clear, data can not be read from the graphs.

· The student’s
provided most of the simulation results.

• The presentation

• The presentation

• The presentation

covered all of the

covered all of the topics
• The presentation

report.

report.

covered most of the
topics in the final report.

presented in logical

presented in logical

Group

• Problems with format and use of language.

• Adequate format and use of language.

• Clear results (figures, graphs…) and
illustrations.

• Poor language skills,

• Acceptable language

• Good language skills,

gestures, etc.

Skills (30%) -

Individual

adequate presentation

skills

presentation skills

Q&A
(100%)

• The student is
not able to answer any of the
questions asked by the instructor.

• The student has a
good understanding of the different concepts of the control theory.

• The student is able to answer all the questions asked by the instructor.

You are viewing 1/3rd of the document.Purchase the document to get full access instantly

Immediately available after payment
Both online and downloadable
No strings attached
How It Works
Login account
Login Your Account
Place in cart
Add to Cart
send in the money
Make payment
Document download
Download File
img

Uploaded by : samiyasabra

PageId: DOCEC488F0