Adequate format and use language some results figures

COURSE Project (30%)
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3
5. Overall Course Grading Scale ........................................................................................ 7
6. Group formation ............................................................................................................. 7
11.Student Assessment Rubric ......................................................................................... 10
Page2
•Incorporate appropriate engineering standards and addresses multiple realistic constraints.
•Apply both analysis and synthesis in the engineering design process, resulting in designs that meet the desired needs.
Figure 1. Reference brew pressure an espresso(a) Elements of the espresso machine system (b)
Page3
| 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| •𝐴= [ | 0 | 1 | ||
| −𝑎0 | −𝑎1 | −𝑎2 | ||
|
|
|||
| •𝐶= [1 | 0 |
|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 𝒂𝟎 | 20 | 150 | 50 | 160 | 10 | 180 | 15 | 200 | 30 | 220 |
| 𝒂𝟏 | 100 | 110 | 300 | 120 | 80 | 140 | 100 | 150 | 130 | 160 |
| 𝒂𝟐 | 100 | 120 | 200 | 130 | 110 | 150 | 150 | 170 | 120 | 140 |
•
| Section Nr | 𝒃 |
|---|---|
| F1 | 1 |
| F2 | 2 |
| F3 | 3 |
| M1 | 4 |
| M2 | 5 |
| M4 | 6 |
| U1 | 7 |
The desired behavior of the controlled system should satisfy the following constraints: • The steady state error should be zero.
4.Calculate the steady state errors for:
Page4
6.How can we choose the value of K to get less than 10% of steady-state error?
7.We want now to use the Ziegler and Nichols methods to tune our PID controller. a.Which method (first or second) is to be used for this system? Justify your answer. b.Use the Ziegler and Nichols method that you identified in question 7.a and tune 3 controllers for your system: P, PI and PID.

Figure 3. PID control system on MATLAB/ Simulink
7.Compare the results obtained by this method with the results obtained in question 7 and draw your conclusions.
Page6
c.Design a controller to meet specifications in time and frequency domain [1,2]. d.Use computer-aided tools for control system analysis and design [1,2].
e.Function on multidisciplinary team to attain the ability of [3,4,5,7]:
-Acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.
| Weight | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project | PD 1: Theoretical Analysis | 15% | |||
| PD 2.A: Simulation Results | 10% | ||||
| PD 2.B: Q&A | 5% | ||||
|
|
||||
✓Students may be asked to work in groups to complete certain assignments. Depending on the needs of the course, the faculty may arrange the groups and inform students on Moodle in advance.
✓PD: Project Deliverable
Important notes:
✓Students of each class need to form project groups (Group 2-3)
Deliverable 1 (PD 1- 15%): Theoretical Analysis (Due date is week 6 – 18/07/2024-11:59PM):
•Based on the variable parameters, each group of students will be working on a different
and hand calculations.
•Students need to bring justification for each result.
•An electronic copy of the report must be submitted through Moodle (Turnitin) on the
due date.
•The presentation is to last 5 minutes and is followed by 5-10 minutes of discussion period. •All presentations must be done using presentation software like MS PowerPoint. An
electronic copy of the presentation must be submitted through Moodle prior to the
-General questions of the concept of PID controllers
8.Academic Integrity and AI Utilization
| for | their | assignments. | The | following | web | site | is | of | value | for |
|---|
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/. Students are also encouraged to visit the AUM
Page8
For all collaborative projects, the entire team bears collective responsibility for the outcome and deliverables of the project. However, certain sections of the project may be evaluated on an individual basis, in accordance with the project's specific requirements as outlined in the project documentation.
Page9
| EE 382 |
|---|
| Project Deliverable 1 (Theoretical Analysis (15%)) Grading Rubric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unsatisfactory | Developing | Satisfactory |
|
||
| (0-59%) | (60%-74%) | (75%-87%) | (>88%) | ||
|
|||||
|
|
• no (or wrong) hand | • all hand calculations are | ||
| calculation is provided |
|
||||
|
|||||
| • brief conclusion and |
|
|
that summarizes the work | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| discussion. | |||||||||
|
|
• future work is well | • excellent future work is | ||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
PD2.A (10%): Simulation Results (Project Presentation):
| EE 382 |
|---|
| Project Deliverable 2.A (Project Presentation (10%)) Grading Rubric |
|---|
|
|
|
||
| • The presentation |
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| • The presentation |
|
||||||||
| covered all of the topics | |||||||||
| • The presentation |
|
|
|||||||
| covered most of the | |||||||||
| topics in the final report. |
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
• Good language skills, | |||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
• The student is able to answer all the questions asked by the instructor. |
|


