a. compute the sample mean hours wasted per year for each
of these urban areas.
Solution:
|
S.No |
Denver (x1) |
Miami (X2) |
San Francisco (X3) |
|
1 |
70 |
66 |
65 |
|
2 |
62 |
70 |
62 |
|
3 |
71 |
55 |
74 |
|
4 |
58 |
65 |
69 |
|
5 |
57 |
56 |
63 |
|
6 |
66 |
66 |
75 |
|
Total |
384 |
378 |
408 |
|
Mean |
64 |
63 |
68 |
Mean of Denver =
= ![]()
=
= 64
Similarly the other for the other cities can be calculated.
Hence we have
Ø Mean of Denver = 64
hours
Ø Mean of Miami = 63
hours
Ø Mean of San Francisco =
68 hours
b.Using a=.05 test for significance differences
among the population mean wasted time for theses three urban areas. what
is the p-value? what is your conclusion?
Solution:
In order to test
whether there is difference in the mean hours wasted by the car drivers, we
have to perform as ANOVA (Analysis of Variance).
Null
hypothesis:
H0: ![]()
That is there is no significance difference among the mean
hours wasted by the drivers in the three cities.
Alternate
hypothesis:
H1: Not all population means are equal.
That is there is significance difference among the mean hours
wasted by the drivers in the three cities.
The Analysis of Variance is carried out using Microsoft Excel. The steps to be
followed in Microsoft Excel are as follows:
·
Select
‘Data’ from the main menu. Then
click ‘Data Analysis’.
·
Select
‘ANOVA – one factor’ from the
analysis tools.
·
Input
the given data range in ‘input range’.
·
Then
click ‘OK’ to get the result.
The above mentioned steps are
followed using Microsoft Excel and the output is given below:
|
Anova: Single Factor |
||||||
|
SUMMARY |
||||||
|
Groups |
Count |
Sum |
Average |
Variance |
||
|
Denvver |
6 |
384 |
64 |
35.6 |
||
|
Miami |
6 |
378 |
63 |
36.8 |
||
|
San Francisco |
6 |
408 |
68 |
31.2 |
||
|
ANOVA |
||||||
|
Source of Variation |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
P-value |
F crit |
|
Between Groups |
84 |
2 |
42 |
1.216216 |
0.323966 |
3.68232 |
|
Within Groups |
518 |
15 |
34.53333333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
602 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
Hence the P-value corresponding to F test statistic is 0.323966.
Statistical
decision:
From the Anova
table, we see that that P-value (0.323966) corresponding to the F test
statistic is greater than 0.05 (level of significance). Hence we do not reject the null hypothesis at 0.05 level of
significance. That is, there is no significance difference among the mean
hours wasted by the drivers in the three cities.
